On 2008-07-05 23:54, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Well, internal hard disks under 100G are getting hard to find, so I doubt
:this is going to be a huge issue. It should be documented.
:
:There's also the possibility that things could be mounted under /, instead
:of multiple partitions.
Yah.
:Question: Is there a minimum recommended size of a PFS, or could you
:create one per user? While it is not a complete replacement for quota it
:would at least solve some of the same problems.
:
:--
:Erik Wikström
You can't specify a size limitation for PFS yet so its kinda a moot
I have noticed a strange problem on HAMMER: when UNIX domain sockets
are created on my HAMMER partition, they cannot be accessed ('Socket
operation on non-socket'), when I try to remove them, I get a 'Bad file
descriptor' message. After a reboot they disappear. What is the reason
for this?
--
Gergo Szakal wrote:
I have noticed a strange problem on HAMMER: when UNIX domain sockets
are created on my HAMMER partition, they cannot be accessed ('Socket
operation on non-socket'), when I try to remove them, I get a 'Bad file
descriptor' message. After a reboot they disappear. What is the
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:18:39 +0200
Rumko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I also encountered 'Bad file descriptor' message (with a ls -la
couldn't see the socket, but csh's autocomplete did find it and that
message was displayed whenever I tried to rm it), but thought I
messed up the machine one
:Gergo Szakal wrote:
:
: I have noticed a strange problem on HAMMER: when UNIX domain sockets
: are created on my HAMMER partition, they cannot be accessed ('Socket
: operation on non-socket'), when I try to remove them, I get a 'Bad file
: descriptor' message. After a reboot they disappear. What
Gergo Szakal wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:18:39 +0200
Rumko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I also encountered 'Bad file descriptor' message (with a ls -la
couldn't see the socket, but csh's autocomplete did find it and that
message was displayed whenever I tried to rm it), but thought I
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:50:47 +0200
Rumko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, AFAIK HAMMER is still not production material, so it's just a
matter of time before it can be used (since from what I read Matt
intends to make HAMMER usable till the next release, it should be
usable for anything but /
: Well, AFAIK HAMMER is still not production material, so it's just a
: matter of time before it can be used (since from what I read Matt
: intends to make HAMMER usable till the next release, it should be
: usable for anything but / when 2.0 comes out?).
:
:It's obvious that bugs can occur,
The main issue for /tmp/ and /var is going to be size. HAMMER is
not really designed for tiny partitions. They would have to be mounted
'nohistory' at a minimum and probably also have to be reblocked daily,
depending on how full they get.
The absolute bare minimum would be
On Sat, July 5, 2008 2:27 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
The main issue for /tmp/ and /var is going to be size. HAMMER is
not really designed for tiny partitions. They would have to be
mounted 'nohistory' at a minimum and probably also have to be
reblocked daily, depending on how
:Well, internal hard disks under 100G are getting hard to find, so I doubt
:this is going to be a huge issue. It should be documented.
:
:There's also the possibility that things could be mounted under /, instead
:of multiple partitions.
Yah. I think what we are moving towards is more of a
12 matches
Mail list logo
