Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> No, it isn't. It is a bug that was fixed a while after 1.4 and pulled up
> later. Are you running the latest version of 1.4?
I do not follow the Dragonfly development. The qemu VM (stock 1.4
release) existed from earlier tests for pkgsrc, so I used it as it
was. I will
Hi,
I am working on a package and the configure stage (running on Dragonfly
1.4.0 in a qemu VM) does not detect a working va_copy() although the
test includes stdarg.h. A closer inspection revealed that va_copy()
depends on __ISO_C_VISIBLE being defined and this happens for me only if
I include sy
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 02:56:33PM +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote:
> Is this the correct behaviour and should such a patch be fed back to the
> software's authors?
No, it isn't. It is a bug that was fixed a while after 1.4 and pulled up
later. Are you running the latest version of 1.4?
Joerg
