RE: Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level

2009-08-14 Thread S.Subramanianmeenaks
To: users@cxf.apache.org Subject: RE: Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level See http://fusesf.fusesource.org/docs/2.2/bind_trans/HTTPDecoupled.html for a discussion of decoupled endpoints. http://iona.com/support/docs/artix/5.5/jaxrpc_pguide/references12.html talks about

Re: Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level

2009-08-06 Thread Andrew Clegg
2009/8/5 conficio kajkand...@conficio.com: My question is: Does the asynchronous Web service some active polling across the TCP connection to keep it alive? Is that the solution I'm looking for, Asynchronous invocation? I'm happy to be corrected if wrong, but I believe the actual TCP

Re: Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level

2009-08-06 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Andrew is correct. JAX-WS async is purely a convenience mechanism to allow the application avoid creating a separate thread to manage the invocation direction. What you really need to avoid is tying up the client-server connection for the duration of the long-running invocation. This could be

Re: Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level

2009-08-06 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Thu August 6 2009 10:03:57 am Eoghan Glynn wrote: Andrew is correct. JAX-WS async is purely a convenience mechanism to allow the application avoid creating a separate thread to manage the invocation direction. What you really need to avoid is tying up the client-server connection for the

RE: Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level

2009-08-06 Thread EVENO Manuel
@cxf.apache.org Objet : Re: Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level Andrew is correct. JAX-WS async is purely a convenience mechanism to allow the application avoid creating a separate thread to manage the invocation direction. What you really need to avoid is tying up the client

RE: Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level

2009-08-06 Thread Eric Johnson
starting point. -Original Message- From: EVENO Manuel [mailto:mev...@generali.fr] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:39 AM To: users@cxf.apache.org Subject: RE: Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level Do you have example or documentation of a decoupled response

Re: Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level

2009-08-06 Thread Daniel Kulp
/ Dan -Original Message- From: EVENO Manuel [mailto:mev...@generali.fr] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:39 AM To: users@cxf.apache.org Subject: RE: Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level Do you have example or documentation of a decoupled response

Re: Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level

2009-08-06 Thread conficio
Thanks guys for a very informative discussion. It saves me a lot of digging in the code and still having the feeling I might have missed something. Kaj -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Asynchronous-Invocation-and-connection-keep-alive-on-the-TCP-level-tp24835434p24849984

Asynchronous Invocation and connection keep alive on the TCP level

2009-08-05 Thread conficio
-and-connection-keep-alive-on-the-TCP-level-tp24835434p24835434.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.