Fw: Entitlements in webservices

2009-01-16 Thread scott . w . sinclair
/01/2009 09:48 - Scott W Sinclair/JPMCHASE 15/01/2009 12:12 To users@cxf.apache.org cc andrew.cl...@gmail.com, users@cxf.apache.org Subject Re: Entitlements in webservices Hi Andrew, Yes, manually controlling the WSDL is a great idea, I guess then I am also moving to a more contract

Re: Fw: Entitlements in webservices

2009-01-16 Thread Arul Dhesiaseelan
@cxf.apache.org cc andrew.cl...@gmail.com, users@cxf.apache.org Subject Re: Entitlements in webservices Hi Andrew, Yes, manually controlling the WSDL is a great idea, I guess then I am also moving to a more contract first approach :) Thanks Regards, Scott Sinclair JP Morgan Chase 45, Waterloo

Re: Entitlements in webservices

2009-01-15 Thread Andrew Clegg
2009/1/15 scott.w.sincl...@jpmchase.com: I think a cooler way would be to have different WSDL generated, so the client stubs don't even have the fields in their generated classes. But how can I make one interface publish 2 different WSDLs and is there a way to autogenerate the WSDLs (as I

Re: Entitlements in webservices

2009-01-15 Thread scott . w . sinclair
6HS Scotland Desk Phone : (+44)-141-228-5450 (direct) e-mail : scott.w.sincl...@jpmchase.com Andrew Clegg and...@nervechannel.com Sent by: andrew.cl...@gmail.com 15/01/2009 11:49 Please respond to users@cxf.apache.org To users@cxf.apache.org cc Subject Re: Entitlements in webservices

Re: Entitlements in webservices

2009-01-15 Thread Daniel Kulp
Contract first is definitely the way to go, but you COULD try something like: Create the SEI interface and types that it references JUST using the public data.Create subclasses of all the types that add the extra fields for the internal stuff. Have an abstract impl that does most of the