27/03/2020 18:26, Benoit Ganne (bganne):
> > Unfortunately the reason was not documented.
> > I suggest we go with a patch from your understanding
> > and we'll test it in multiple conditions to validate nothing is broken.
>
> Done: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-March/161096.html
Very
> Unfortunately the reason was not documented.
> I suggest we go with a patch from your understanding
> and we'll test it in multiple conditions to validate nothing is broken.
Done: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-March/161096.html
Thx
ben
27/03/2020 11:02, Benoit Ganne (bganne):
> > Second, as Benoit said, we should relax this requirement.
> > If the link speed is unknown, a second request can be tried, no more.
> > Benoit, feel free to submit a patch showing how you think it should
> > behave.
> > Otherwise, I guess a maintainer
> Second, as Benoit said, we should relax this requirement.
> If the link speed is unknown, a second request can be tried, no more.
> Benoit, feel free to submit a patch showing how you think it should
> behave.
> Otherwise, I guess a maintainer of mlx5 will try to arrange it later.
> Note: a
