Hi，Ali
Has the DPDK mailing list been migrated?
I find that after I send a patch to d...@dpdk.org, others and myself
cannot receive the patch. We are registered members of d...@dpdk.org.
However, we can receive patch emails sent or copied to d...@dpdk.org from
others in the community.
We
Hi Yong,
Thanks for quick response.
As per "vmxnet3" PCI bus device information, we got MSI-X based
interrupt-line as mentioned below in the "sysfs":
we are able to get link-changes interrupts, but, on top it we get all other
interrupts also, which is taking more CPU-time when traffic load.
Vmxnet3 driver supports lsc and your observation is a known behavior with
vmxnet3 running with INTx/MSI interrupt mode. Enabling or disabling lsc intr
in this mode will enable/disable RX interrupts as well. This is a device
behavior and there is no known way to mask just lsc or rx interrupts
+Cc Yong Wang, maintainer of this PMD.
14/01/2021 18:30, madhukar mythri:
> Hi,
>
> Does vmxnet3 PMD support LSC=1(i.e with interrupt mode) for link changes ?
>
> When i enable LSC=1 the functionality works fine, but, when pumping traffic
> i'm seeing increasing in CPU load on some cores which
On 1/13/21 9:59 PM, Myth Ren wrote:
Hi， all
is it possible we are mirror traffic from switch/router to PF, then a
program based on DPDK
read packet from a VF related to the PF, presume we are mirror the traffic
from PF to the VF （promiscuous），
while the PF device still managed by the
Hi,
Does vmxnet3 PMD support LSC=1(i.e with interrupt mode) for link changes ?
When i enable LSC=1 the functionality works fine, but, when pumping traffic
i'm seeing increasing in CPU load on some cores which is running
"eal-intr-thread" epoll_wait() function for more CPU-time.
Actually,
