Hi,
I have a 82599ES that functions well on linux (i.e. ixgbe).
However, when binded to dpdk 100% of the received packets are counted as
missed (using testpmd as well as my own stable application), and non arrive
to the application.
I wonder what can be the reason. Why does it functions well on l
e
to count pkts in/out to and from the vm.
If someone has an idea how to do that i will be more than happy to hear.
edgar
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 10:09 AM edgar helmut
wrote:
> I tried this procedure as well as few others.
> at all of the procedures the HugePages_Free or HugePages
esn't really make the job.
any idea?
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 8:52 PM Stephen Hemminger <
step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:59:08 +
> edgar helmut wrote:
>
> > short explanation for how to read the comparison:
> > first row is packet
throughput) in gbps.
i.e. on 1500 bytes packet size testpmd delivers ~9.82 gbps from port 1 to 2
and another ~9.82 gbps from port 2 to 1, while at the vm it only delivers
~3.9 gbps for each direction.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 5:52 PM edgar helmut
wrote:
> Thanks. That's the document i am f
for to measure in and out packets through host, maybe
> you can look at vhost/virtio interface also.
>
>
>
> After your testing, if you can report the performace out with macvtap,
> that also helps us. J
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* edgar helmut [mailto:helmut.edgar...@gmail.
t; huge pages and macvtap. Any specific purpose?
>
>
>
> I think you should get a baseline first, then to get how much perf dropped
> if using anonymous hugepages or macvtap。
>
> 1. Baseline: real hugepage + real pci pass-through
>
> 2. Anon hugepages vs hugepages
perf dropped
if using anonymous hugepages or macvtap。
1. Baseline: real hugepage + real pci pass-through
2. Anon hugepages vs hugepages
3. Real pci pass-through vs. macvtap
*From:* edgar helmut [mailto:helmut.edgar...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Saturday, December 24, 2016 3:23 AM
*To:*
that forwarding ~5-6 gbps between two ports should be trivial, so
it will be great if someone can share its configuration for a tested setup.
Any further idea will be highly appreciated.
Thanks.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 2:56 PM edgar helmut
wrote:
> That's what I afraid.
> In fact i need
d ~4G
> (4360192KB). So some were mapped to 4K pages.
>
>
>
> BTW, the memory used by transparent hugepage is not the hugepage you
> reserved in kernel boot option.
>
>
>
> *From:* edgar helmut [mailto:helmut.edgar...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 16, 201
x27;t grantee the app is
> using
> > the real huge pages.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: users [mailto:users-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of edgar helmut
> > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 9:32 PM
> > To: Wiles, Keith
> > Cc: use
> Sometimes, transparent huge page mechanism doesn't grantee the app is using
> the real huge pages.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of edgar helmut
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 9:32 PM
> To: Wiles, K
see significant difference
between the vm and the host which I can't fully explain.
any further idea?
Regards,
Edgar
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
> > On Dec 15, 2016, at 1:20 AM, edgar helmut
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> > Some help is nee
Hi.
Some help is needed to understand performance issue on virtual machine.
Running testpmd over the host functions well (testpmd forwards 10g between
two 82599 ports).
However same application running on a virtual machine over same host
results with huge degradation in performance.
The testpmd th
install...).
Thanks
On 05 Dec 2016 7:27 PM, "gowrishankar muthukrishnan" <
gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
On Friday 25 November 2016 01:28 PM, edgar helmut wrote:
> Hi,
> I am following http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vhost.html using
> 16.11 in
Hi,
the silence confuses me, at least I would like to understand if it is well
supported or not for the release so I can decide whether to find an
alternative or not.
what is the trigger for the guest to send the VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_KICK?
Thanks
Edgar
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:58 AM edgar
Hi,
I am following http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vhost.html using
16.11 in order to have a simple VM forwarding packets from one NIC to
another efficiently, but it doesn't work... so I need some help to
understand what am i missing.
I am using x520 (intel 82599).
host is ubuntu 16.04 and
16 matches
Mail list logo
