Dear all,
I am observing a very low performance when running OVS-DPDK when compared
to OVS running with the Kernel Datapath.
I have OvS version 2.13.90 compiled from source with the latest stable DPDK
v19.11.3 on a stable Debian system running kernel 4.19.0-9-amd64 (real
version:4.19.118).
I
So,
> You don't mention how many different flows you're using in the test.
Don't be surprised as throughput drops when you move from 1,000 flows to
1,000,000 flows.
We currently only have 1 flow, the basic packet forwarding rule. We used
pktgen standard built-in packet generation without any pcap
> Why don't you reserve any CPUs for OVS/DPDK or VM usage? All
> published
> performance white papers recommend settings for CPU isolation like
> this
> Mellanox DPDK performance report:
>
>
https://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_19_08_Mellanox_NIC_performance_report.pdf
On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 02:08 +0800, Vipul Ujawane wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: David Christensen
> Date: Fri, Jun 26, 2020, 02:03
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Poor performance when using OVS with DPDK
> To: Vipul Ujawane ,
>
>
>
>
&g
On 6/24/20 4:03 AM, Vipul Ujawane wrote:
Dear all,
I am observing a very low performance when running OVS-DPDK when compared
to OVS running with the Kernel Datapath.
I have OvS version 2.13.90 compiled from source with the latest stable DPDK
v19.11.3 on a stable Debian system running kernel
Dear all,
I am observing a very low performance when running OVS-DPDK when compared
to OVS running with the Kernel Datapath.
I have OvS version 2.13.90 compiled from source with the latest stable DPDK
v19.11.3 on a stable Debian system running kernel 4.19.0-9-amd64 (real
version:4.19.118).
I
