Hey everyone,
Does anyone happen to know if it is possible to receive non-contiguous mbufs
from rte_eth_rx_burst? If so, when would this happen? I am thinking that NICs
with LSO enabled could possibly do this if data does not fit into
RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE? But if the packet fits, I don't
Andrew,
Thanks again, I thought I had already applied these changes. Rebuilt
everything, and l3fwd works as expected.
Is there a way to get any stats from l3fwd ?
Thanks
Chris
> On 02/09/2017 02:14 AM, Chris Hall wrote:
>> I’m having a bit of trouble running the l3fwd example program, I keep
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 22:17:56 +
"Lazarenko, Vlad (WorldQuant)" wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Does anyone happen to know if it is possible to receive non-contiguous mbufs
> from rte_eth_rx_burst? If so, when would this happen? I am thinking that NICs
> with LSO
Hi,
I have some basic doubt about DPDK memory allocation.
1. rte_malloc will allocate memory from hugepage memory ?
2. If we use normal malloc, this will be allocated from heap. will this
allocation also useful for dpdk?
3. Or for better performance we have to use only rte_malloc?
Please provide
Chris,
On 02/10/2017 03:05 AM, Chris Hall wrote:
Thanks again, I thought I had already applied these changes. Rebuilt
everything, and l3fwd works as expected.
Is there a way to get any stats from l3fwd ?
I see no way to get any stats from the example app.
Regards,
Andrew.
Found a crash in the FM10k vector driver when it tries to send a packet with a
VLAN header priority (PCP) field value >= 4. This results in the FM10k
returning the following error.
testpmd> PMD: fm10k_dev_interrupt_handler_pf(): INT: find fault!
PMD: fm10k_dev_handle_fault():
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Hart
> Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 11:43 AM
> To: users@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] Crash in FM10k - fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
Hi Anthony,
> Found a crash in the FM10k vector driver when it tries to