I ran more tests,
This AMD server is a bit confusing, I can tune it to capture 28Mpps (64
bytes frame) from one single core, so I would assume that using one more
core will at least increase a bit the capture capabilities, but it's
not, 1% more speed and it drops regardless of how many queues are
Hi Filip,
i have not seen the same issues.
Are you aware of this tuning guide? I applied it and had no issues with intel
100G NIC.
HPC Tuning Guide for AMD EPYC Processors
http://developer.amd.com/wp-content/resources/56420.pdf
Hope it helps.
Cheers,
Steffen Weise
> Am 11.09.2021 um 10:56
I wanted just to add, while running the same exact testpmd on the other
machine I won't get a single miss with the same patter traffic:
.
testpmd> stop
Telling cores to stop...
Waiting for lcores to finish...
--- Forward Stats for RX Port= 0/Queue= 0 -> TX Port= 0/Queue= 0
---
Thanks,
I knew that document and we've implemented many of those settings/rules,
but perhaps there's one crucial I've forgot? Wonder which one.
Anyway, increasing the amount of queues impinge the performance, while
sending 250M packets over a 100GbE link to an Intel 810-cqda2 NIC
mounted on the
