I dont see why it should
*Regards:*
Zain ul Abideen
*Disclaimer**: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments
is confidential; it is intended only for use of the individual or entity
named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
you are notified
Hi,
*i40e card is :*
00:09.0 *Ether*net controller: Intel Corporation XL710/X710 Virtual
Function (rev 01)
00:0a.0 *Ether*net controller: Intel Corporation XL710/X710 Virtual
Function (rev 01)
firmware-version: f4.40 a1.4 n04.53 e80001dc0
Is there any extra verbose/debug in DPDK which we
Formatting note:
Please avoid top posting (inline replies are preferred),
and do not include such disclaimer, not relevant on a mailing list.
Thanks
2016-02-10 16:00, Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen:
> Hi Saurabh,
> Can you tell me what card you are uing
>
>
> *Regards:*
> Zain ul Abideen
>
>
>
KVM/QEMU
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Nick Allen wrote:
> What is typically used instead of VirtualBox? I'd be happy to try an
> alternative. Ideally, it would be something that could run across
> different host operating systems; including OS X and Linux.
>
> Thanks for your thoughts.
>
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:45:20 -0500
Nick Allen wrote:
> Problem: I am unable to bind a virtual NIC using DPDK 2.2.0 that I
> created inside of a Ubuntu 14.04 guest running in VirtualBox 5.0.14 on
> OS X 10.11.3 on a 2015 Macbook Pro. Here is the error that I am
> seeing.
>
Do you mean the
Problem: I am unable to bind a virtual NIC using DPDK 2.2.0 that I
created inside of a Ubuntu 14.04 guest running in VirtualBox 5.0.14 on
OS X 10.11.3 on a 2015 Macbook Pro. Here is the error that I am
seeing.
$ ./tools/dpdk_nic_bind.py --bind=vfio-pci 00:11.0
Error: bind failed for
