Thanks Marco,
I'm running DPDK 18.02. I might understand that the counter is not
implemented yet, but why rte_eth_rx_burst never returns nb_pkts?
According to:
http://dpdk.org/doc/api/rte__ethdev_8h.html#a3e7d76a451b46348686ea97d6367f102
"The rte_eth_rx_burst() function returns the number of
Hi Filip,
which dpdk version are you using? You can take a look to the source code of
dpdk , the rxdrop counter may be not implemented in dpdk. So you always get 0
in rxdrop.
Thanks,
Marco
18/3/25 (週日)，Filip Janiszewski
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of
> long...@viettel.com.vn
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2018 11:59 AM
> To: users@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] Apply patches from the mailing list
>
> A very basic question, but how do I apply some of the
Hi Everybody,
I have a weird drop problem, and to understand my question the best way
is to have a look at this simple (and cleaned from all the not relevant
stuff) snippet:
while( 1 )
{
if( config->running == false ) {
break;
}
num_of_pkt = rte_eth_rx_burst( config->port_id,
Hello DPDK users,
in the dpdk document
http://dpdk.readthedocs.io/en/v17.11/nics/features.html
there is a mention about Macsec and Timestamp offload.
but I have no clue of how to use these features.
Would it be possible to know where I can find at least how these features
are enabled? there is
A very basic question, but how do I apply some of the patches that
were put on the dev mailing list to try it out? I already looked at
the next- subtrees but apparently even major patch set such as the new
packet framework/ip_pipeline is not in there (yet).
The contributor guideline only has
