Hi Dikshant,
Summarizing the contents from earlier mails below
1. Issue-1 shared with PDUMP not working with testpmd - solution shared and
suggested what needs to be added to fix the same.
2. Issue-2 shared for custom Makefile for application not working - pointed out
possible cause and
Hi Asaf,
I want to filter some L7 protocols.
Example use cases could be to send all TLS handshakes to a certain queue,
or drop all DNS queries, and I do not want to rely on port numbers to do so.
>From my understanding, the RAW item type does not support ranges in the
specification (I wish it
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:07:29 +0530
Archit Pandey wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have been using DPDK's QoS framework over the last year and found
> that rte_sched and the provided qos_sched app work great for QoS.
>
> However, when we ventured into trying to add CoDel (to replace RED) as
> a
Hello everyone,
We have been using DPDK's QoS framework over the last year and found
that rte_sched and the provided qos_sched app work great for QoS.
However, when we ventured into trying to add CoDel (to replace RED) as
a dropper to the framework, we faced several challenges due to how
tightly
Hello Gerry,
Regarding your question about RAW. Can you specify your use case?
In high level planning we'll consider supporting it in 21.02.
Regards,
Asaf Penso
-Original Message-
From: users On Behalf Of Erez Ferber
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 9:25 PM
To: Gerry Wan
Cc: users@dpdk.org
29/07/2020 09:20, Chengchang Tang:
> Hi,
> DPDK with 'make' will be deprecated in a future release. I have some
> questions about using meson to build DPDK.
>
> When using the make, we can change the macros in config/common_base to
> control the compiling macros. For example, if i want to debug
> -Original Message-
> From: Chengchang Tang
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 9:36 AM
> To: users@dpdk.org
> Cc: linux...@huawei.com; users@dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] meson: is there a mechanism for controlling
> compilation configuration
>
> cc'ed bruce
>
Couple more request,
1. please avoid ` NOT FROM AIRSPAN - Caution - External ` headers & banners.
2. If possible, use `snip` or `snipped` to remove clutter and bring foucs
Snipped
> Hi Dikshant,
>
> Looks like the custom Makefile log is quite different in passing DPDK CFLAGS
> and LDFLAGS.
Hi Dikshant,
Looks like the custom Makefile log is quite different in passing DPDK CFLAGS
and LDFLAGS. Also here are couple of surprises for me
1. Unable to find `make -n` logs
2. presence of g++ is present in each line
3. unable to find include option
4. request was to run `make -n` and
cc'ed bruce
On 2020/7/29 15:20, Chengchang Tang wrote:
> Hi,
> DPDK with 'make' will be deprecated in a future release. I have some
> questions about using meson to build DPDK.
>
> When using the make, we can change the macros in config/common_base to
> control the compiling macros. For example,
Hi,
DPDK with 'make' will be deprecated in a future release. I have some
questions about using meson to build DPDK.
When using the make, we can change the macros in config/common_base to
control the compiling macros. For example, if i want to debug the mbuf,
i can set
11 matches
Mail list logo
