-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Ananyev
Sent: Sunday, 15 May 2022 23:54
To: Ido Goshen ; Ananyev, Konstantin
; users@dpdk.org; d...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: Does ACL support field size of 8 bytes?
My concern was it is sort of awkward in terms of input_field value for rules
with
8B
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Ananyev
> Sent: Sunday, 15 May 2022 23:54
> To: Ido Goshen ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> ; users@dpdk.org; d...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: Does ACL support field size of 8 bytes?
>
>
> My concern was it is sort of awkward in
11/05/2022 15:28, Ido Goshen пишет:
-Original Message-
From: Ananyev, Konstantin
Sent: Tuesday, 26 April 2022 20:57
To: Ido Goshen ; users@dpdk.org;
d...@dpdk.org
Cc: Konstantin Ananyev
Subject: RE: Does ACL support field size of 8 bytes?
Hi Ido,
I've lots of good experience
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 April 2022 20:57
> To: Ido Goshen ; users@dpdk.org;
> d...@dpdk.org
> Cc: Konstantin Ananyev
> Subject: RE: Does ACL support field size of 8 bytes?
>
>
> Hi Ido,
>
> >
Hi Ido,
> I've lots of good experience with ACL but can't make it work with u64 values
> I know it can be split to 2xu32 fields, but it makes it more complex to use
> and a wastes double number of fields (we hit the
> RTE_ACL_MAX_FIELDS 64 limit)
Wow, that's a lot of fields...
> According to
