Re: HAMMER2 stability

2017-10-23 Thread Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
I chose HAMMER and not HAMMER2 in the installation process :-( /PA El 23 oct. 2017 10:58, "karu.pruun" escribió: > Hello > > Good to hear you got DragonFly running. I suppose it was HAMMER2 that > caused problems, not HAMMER---the latter is stable. > > Apart from HAMMER2,

Re: HAMMER2 stability

2017-10-23 Thread Michael Neumann
On 10/23/17 10:58, karu.pruun wrote: Hello Good to hear you got DragonFly running. I suppose it was HAMMER2 that caused problems, not HAMMER---the latter is stable. Apart from HAMMER2, could you possibly tell more about what are you missing (list or privately)? This may help improve things

Re: HAMMER2 stability

2017-10-23 Thread karu.pruun
Hello Good to hear you got DragonFly running. I suppose it was HAMMER2 that caused problems, not HAMMER---the latter is stable. Apart from HAMMER2, could you possibly tell more about what are you missing (list or privately)? This may help improve things in the future. Cheers Peeter -- On

Re: HAMMER2 stability

2017-10-23 Thread Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
Hi folks, After I got DFly running on my old Optimus laptop, I got an exception from the hammer module and wasn't able to recover it. I gave FreeBSD 11.1 a try and have almost everything I need running much more out of the box than with DFly. You are getting better and I will put my notes on

Re: HAMMER2 stability

2017-10-22 Thread Antonio Olivares
On Sunday, October 22, 2017, Carsten Mattner wrote: > Is HAMMER2 considered experimental and not for production data? That is what the 5.0 release page states: https://www.dragonflybsd.org/release50/ Do we have debug_fs file restoration tools, in case things goes

HAMMER2 stability

2017-10-22 Thread Carsten Mattner
Is HAMMER2 considered experimental and not for production data? Do we have debug_fs file restoration tools, in case things goes south?