I chose HAMMER and not HAMMER2 in the installation process :-(
/PA
El 23 oct. 2017 10:58, "karu.pruun" escribió:
> Hello
>
> Good to hear you got DragonFly running. I suppose it was HAMMER2 that
> caused problems, not HAMMER---the latter is stable.
>
> Apart from HAMMER2,
On 10/23/17 10:58, karu.pruun wrote:
Hello
Good to hear you got DragonFly running. I suppose it was HAMMER2 that
caused problems, not HAMMER---the latter is stable.
Apart from HAMMER2, could you possibly tell more about what are you
missing (list or privately)? This may help improve things
Hello
Good to hear you got DragonFly running. I suppose it was HAMMER2 that
caused problems, not HAMMER---the latter is stable.
Apart from HAMMER2, could you possibly tell more about what are you
missing (list or privately)? This may help improve things in the
future.
Cheers
Peeter
--
On
Hi folks,
After I got DFly running on my old Optimus laptop, I got an exception from
the hammer module and wasn't able to recover it. I gave FreeBSD 11.1 a try
and have almost everything I need running much more out of the box than
with DFly. You are getting better and I will put my notes on
On Sunday, October 22, 2017, Carsten Mattner
wrote:
> Is HAMMER2 considered experimental and not for production data?
That is what the 5.0 release page states:
https://www.dragonflybsd.org/release50/
Do we have debug_fs file restoration tools, in case things goes
Is HAMMER2 considered experimental and not for production data?
Do we have debug_fs file restoration tools, in case things goes south?