On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> On Aug 20, 2013, at 14:05, Justin Sherrill wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Dongsheng Song
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 4156467 bytes/sec = 3.964 MB/s
>>
>> I don't have a good answer for you other than that it's not endemic to
>> Drago
@Francois Tigeot: Thanks for the pointer.
It would be nice to know how it fares with DragonFlyBSD with some
benchmarks, if available and convenient. ;-)
On 8/20/13, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 06:56:34AM +, Zenny wrote:
>> Great. It would be nice if you can share some ha
Hi, Sepherosa,
Thanks for your reply. I'm glad to know Multi FIB probably will be
supported in the next release cycle, did you have some plan about support flow
cache, npf or smp friendly pf, and per-cpu statistics, netflow/ipfix etc. As a
router box, we need a platform with "integrated so
http://research.cs.wisc.edu/adsl/Publications/iron-sosp05.pdf
Compares ext3, Reiser, and NTFS. How does Hammer compare with them?
Pierre
--
Jews use a lunisolar calendar; Muslims use a solely lunar calendar.
On Aug 20, 2013, at 14:05, Justin Sherrill wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Dongsheng Song
> wrote:
>
>> 4156467 bytes/sec = 3.964 MB/s
>
> I don't have a good answer for you other than that it's not endemic to
> DragonFly - this is what I got under VMWare Workstation:
>
> 107374182
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Dongsheng Song
wrote:
> 4156467 bytes/sec = 3.964 MB/s
I don't have a good answer for you other than that it's not endemic to
DragonFly - this is what I got under VMWare Workstation:
1073741824 bytes transferred in 24.643408 secs (43571158 bytes/sec)
- Which
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 06:56:34AM +, Zenny wrote:
> Great. It would be nice if you can share some hardware specifications
> and make of the new blade server to help more people to adopt hardware
> that DragonFlyBSD supports.
It's a MicroCloud with 12 Haswell Xeon nodes:
http://www.supermicro.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:37 PM, k simon wrote:
>
> Hi,list:
>
> I have some linux router/NAT box, each can serve 500-600Kpps traffic.
> Last week, I observed the ddos attack, it report ipt_netflow sendbuffer
> overlimit and cpu usage high. So I took a look at BSD family. I've tested
> freebs
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:00 PM, jinge wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> Is there any policy routing tool in dragonflybsd like the setfib in
> FreeBSD?
>
>
We don't have multiple routing table (mutiple FIB) support yet.
Best Regards,
sephe
--
Tomorrow Will Never Die
Hi,list:
I have some linux router/NAT box, each can serve 500-600Kpps traffic. Last
week, I observed the ddos attack, it report ipt_netflow sendbuffer overlimit
and cpu usage high. So I took a look at BSD family. I've tested freebsd a bit,
it have trouble with polling and NIC‘s multi queues
Great. It would be nice if you can share some hardware specifications
and make of the new blade server to help more people to adopt hardware
that DragonFlyBSD supports.
However, I read somewhere (at Justin's blog if I remember right) that
it was from iXsystems.
Good luck!
On 8/19/13, Matthew Dil
11 matches
Mail list logo