On 12 Aug 2014, at 16:06, Erik Schnetter <schnet...@cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2014, at 11:47 , Peter Diener <die...@cct.lsu.edu> wrote: > >> Minutes from the Einstein Toolkit Meeting on August 11, 2014. >> >> Present: >> >> Frank, Peter, Barry, Josef, Ian, Steve, Josh, Jonah. >> >> Tickets: >> >> 778: PittNullCode is slow to compile. Frank is not sure what to do about >> it. According to Josef there is a constraint function that is slow. >> Josef usually does not compile this file. Ask Bela and or Roland about >> suggestions about what to do. Check if newer Intel compilers compiles it >> faster. Is it an option to remove it from ET. > > If I recall correctly, then this function is written in a whole-array style. > Rewriting this with explicit index operations and surrounding it by a loop > should improve compile time significantly. Roland already did this, and saw a speed improvement (see the ticket). I believe this improvement only helped with older compilers though. With 14.0.0, the file still takes 20 minutes to compile. -- Ian Hinder http://numrel.aei.mpg.de/people/hinder
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
