.
*
Best Regards
***
Gaëtan PRUVOST
LIMSI-CNRS BP 133
91403 Orsay Cedex France
Tel:+33 1 69858110
http://www.limsi.fr/Individu/pruvost/
***
Le 30/03/2012 07:11, Francesco Furfari a écrit :
Hi,
cybergarage seems again active
Hi,
cybergarage seems again active, different e-mails exechanged recently.
By the way, I know about a new implementation derived from cybergareage
called YOUPI that is available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/youpi/.
It is developed by Gaetan Pruvost and relesed with CeCILL-B license, and
is currently collecting requirements
for
the new specification. If you let us know the requirements, we can work
on
an update of the UPnP specification.
Regards,
Kai
Am 07.01.2011 um 13:47 schrieb Francesco Furfari:
Dear LongkerDandy,
I think the right place to ask about updates of the UPnP
Dear LongkerDandy,
I think the right place to ask about updates of the UPnP Specification
is the OSGi Alliance (osgi-...@mail.osgi.org)
or the OSGi Residential Expert Group.
You are right, the OSGi UPnP specification hides a number of things
(there are pro and cons).
Few weeks ago there
Hi Richard, Charbel,
I think Charbel was referring to the UPnP Standard Device Control
Protocol (DCP) called Device Management:
http://upnp.org/specs/dm/dm1/
I know it was a DCP initially proposed by FranceTelecom (Andre Bottaro)
as ExecutionPlatform.
I followed it a bit at the beginning,
Hello,
you can find the sources of the modifies Cybergarage stack (CyberDomo)
in maven central repository
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/it/cnr/isti/domoware/cyberdomo/upnp-stack/1.8.0/.
Best regards,
francesco
abidi imen ha scritto:
I have this code source but i can't compile it,
Please haw
Hello Asma,
more or less your bundle should:
1) Search for the UPnPDevice service that matches your device
String myFilter = ( + UPnPDevice.ID + =+ aDeviceId + );
ServiceReference[] refs =
context.getServiceReferences(UPnPDevice.class.getName(),myFilter );
if (refs != null) {
UPnPDevice
Hello Asma,
I think that a refinement driver would be the typical OSGi approach. I
mean that first you should define a ZigBee Device model (similar to the
UPnP one UPnPDevice, UPnP ACtion , and so on ...) and then refine every
ZigBeeDevice registered with the framework like UPnPDevice.
In
Hello all,
I realized that javadoc are not always deployed together the Felix
artifacts in the central maven repository.
They would be useful for enabling online help. We can fix it for the
next releases, but perhaps for artifacts org.osgi.* we should
immediately add the documentation,
Hello,
this year there are many Felix people at the OSGiDevConf, it would be
nice to meet up for the dinner (or later) on Sunday.
WDYT?, I should arrive at Zurich Sunday around the 20.00, it's the first
time for me in Zurich, any idea about a possible meeting-point?
regards,
francesco
Hi Asma,
if your question is:
Can UPnP devices coexist on the same host machine? one developed by
using Felix Base driver and another one (the mentioned Mediaserver)
developed by third party?
The answer is yes, the port is not a problem.
It is a port used by all the devices belonging to the
point
M-Search, devices should send an unicast ssdp message. I want to know to which
port?
Does the basedrievr specify any port?
--- En date de : Mar 19.5.09, Francesco Furfari francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.it a écrit :
De: Francesco Furfari francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.it
Objet: Re: UPnP Port
À
that the basedriver import in its
code the org.cybergarage and I dont know from where the basedriver get this
library? I don't have it?
thanks in advance
--- En date de : Mar 19.5.09, Francesco Furfari francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.it
a écrit :
De: Francesco Furfari francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.it
Hi Asma, Sana
I fixed the bug by changing the type used by the clock to a DateTime
type. Update and rebuild the TV and clock device to test them.
FYI, 1) I changed the types used by the UPnPStateVariable of the clock
*TimeStateVariable*, line 46;
public Class getJavaDataType() {
return
the remote clock.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks in advance
Asma
De : Francesco Furfari francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.it
À : users@felix.apache.org
Envoyé le : Jeudi, 2 Avril 2009, 14h06mn 27s
Objet : Re: Problem with upnp examples
hello,
if I remember well
hello,
if I remember well, it should be a problem of data types used in the
examples, actually the clock sends time events, not dates event. We
continued to used the same types used by Cyberlink devices (that's time
or string I don't remember perfectly now) , but the TV uses a Date type.
So
]at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Started: Apache Felix UPnP Base Driver (#730)
Thanks in advance
Asma
--- En date de : Mar 24.3.09, Francesco Furfari francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.it
a écrit :
De: Francesco Furfari francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.it
Objet: Re: upnp base driver
À: users@felix.apache.org
Date
upnp but i don't know
how to launch them (control point and devices )
can anyone show me how?
please i need your help
thanks
2009/3/23 Francesco Furfari francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.it
hello,
it should be simple
try to launch two instances of the felix runtime with the devices you have
hello,
it should be simple
try to launch two instances of the felix runtime with the devices you
have already tested ... in each instance you should see the two clocks
and two TVs devices( being one local and the other remote). Clearly it
works also if you launch the two instances on
Hello Asma,
You can start with UPnP OSGi by reading the UPnP Device Service
specification in the OSGi Service Compendium
(http://www.osgi.org/Release4/Download)
It defines a set of interfaces
(http://www.osgi.org/javadoc/r4v41/org/osgi/service/upnp/package-summary.html)
which are used to
and they will be released after the next release of the base
driver (0.9).
regards,
francesco
regards
Rian
Francesco Furfari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09-09-2008
07:10:57 PM:
Dear Rian,
I'm sorry but only the UpnP basedriver has been released so far. The
documentation refers to the building of all
Dear Rian,
I'm sorry but only the UpnP basedriver has been released so far. The
documentation refers to the building of all the UpnP bundles from the
source code. After checked out the Felix trunk and built the Felix
bundles you should be able to launch the UPnP bundles by using the
script
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Daniel Felsing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 01. August 2008 08:03
An: users@felix.apache.org
Cc: 'Francesco Furfari'; 'Stefano Kismet Lenzi'
Betreff: UPnP Basedriver 0.8.0 from felix - Devices get lost
after a certain period of time...(basedriver
in the upnp tester from felix.
So...when registering / removing a new listener there must happen
anything which influences the initial or overall?? eventing behaviour of
the upnp devices.
Kind regards, Daniel Felsing
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Francesco Furfari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
of it
Maybe this can lead u to something?
Kind regards,
Daniel Felsing
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Francesco Furfari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 14:49
An: users@felix.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8
No I mean the routine you use for counting the devices sending a notify.
That's, the code implementing the subscription.
basically you are running all the UPnP related code on the same felix
runtime.
francesco
Daniel Felsing wrote:
With listener routine you mean the UPnPEventNotifier?
An: users@felix.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8
Ok - what should the jira issue contain?
Also my source code?
What else?
Kind regards,
Daniel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Francesco Furfari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 17:27
Hi Daniel,
it seems that two are the devices that whose events are not captured by
your tester code:
uuid:AT-SM-FHZ1-simplelight1 urn:upnp-org:serviceId:SwitchDevice:1Status
uuid:AT-SM-FHZ1-switch3 urn:upnp-org:serviceId:GetStatus:1Status
please, check the code generating the events for such
28 matches
Mail list logo
