Re: Does SCR have to start before the bundles with services?

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:34 AM, David Jencks wrote: > Neither this nor restarting the framework should cause problems. > > Can you come up with a self contained demonstration of this (no components) > behavior? I vaguely recall someone having a similar problem

Re: Does SCR have to start before the bundles with services?

Neither this nor restarting the framework should cause problems. Can you come up with a self contained demonstration of this (no components) behavior? I vaguely recall someone having a similar problem that I couldn’t reproduce. thanks david jencks > On Sep 28, 2016, at 8:50 AM, Benson

Re: Does SCR have to start before the bundles with services?

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, David Jencks > wrote: >> It should work in any order. The only other thing I can think of is this: in the application I'm working with, the code

Re: Does SCR have to start before the bundles with services?

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, David Jencks wrote: > It should work in any order. OK, then I've got some other problem on my hands. Does the last of these three messages indicate a problem? 177 [FelixStartLevel] INFO org.apache.felix.scr.2.0.6 - Starting

Re: Does SCR have to start before the bundles with services?

It should work in any order. david jencks > On Sep 28, 2016, at 8:28 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > > I'm trying to retrofit SCR/DS into a very dumb application that loads > some bundles and starts the framework. Everything is at the same start > level, and no @Components

Does SCR have to start before the bundles with services?

I'm trying to retrofit SCR/DS into a very dumb application that loads some bundles and starts the framework. Everything is at the same start level, and no @Components are ever activated. I have logging working; I see 191 [FelixStartLevel] INFO org.apache.felix.scr.2.0.6 - Starting with