On 28 Feb 2013, at 07:05, fbalicchia wrote:
I think it is the best choice to follow the naming convention.
What I do not understand is why plugins can't be hosted by Apache
The Apache Maven team prefer to keep the maven-NNN-plugin naming for plugins
developed and maintained by them (ie. those
It's not completely related to the naming discussion, but more about the
relation-ship with maven itself.
Is it possible (in a more a less near future) to have bundle type
recognized by default by maven ?
--G
2013/2/28 Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com
On 28 Feb 2013, at 07:05, fbalicchia
On Feb 28, 2013, at 13:43 , Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 Feb 2013, at 07:05, fbalicchia wrote:
I think it is the best choice to follow the naming convention.
What I do not understand is why plugins can't be hosted by Apache
The Apache Maven team prefer to keep the
On 28 Feb 2013, at 12:57, Guillaume Sauthier (OW2/GMail) wrote:
It's not completely related to the naming discussion, but more about the
relation-ship with maven itself.
Is it possible (in a more a less near future) to have bundle type
recognized by default by maven ?
--G
That's an
During the [DISCUSS] rename maven-bundle-plugin to bnd-maven-plugin thread
Marcel and Guillaume came up with counter-suggestions involving contributing
the maven-bundle-plugin to Apache Maven.
This idea has certain advantages - the plugin name would not be an issue
(assuming the Maven team
Am 27.02.2013 23:25, schrieb Dhiego Abrantes de Oliveira Martins:
Christian,
I follow these steps:
1- Implements AdderService (using @WebService) (interface)
2- Implements AdderServiceImpl (using @WebService) (Provider)
3- deploy item 1 and 2 in a container OSGi 1.
4- Create a *importer
Dear Sir,
I am writing to inquire regarding your web page about Apache Felix
Framework Usage Documentation where I have found a lot of useful
information. My name is Anja and I'm currently studying at the Faculty
of Computer Science in Belgrade.
Here is the URL of your article:
Hi
I fear you would have to contact the PAX people general (at) ops4j (dot) org.
Regards
Felix
Am 28.02.2013 um 20:56 schrieb lessonz:
I have an app wherein I'm deploying the Felix framework and loading in my
own bundles and dependency bundles. One of the dependencies I'd like to use
is PAX
Thanks Felix.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.comwrote:
Hi
I fear you would have to contact the PAX people general (at) ops4j (dot)
org.
Regards
Felix
Am 28.02.2013 um 20:56 schrieb lessonz:
I have an app wherein I'm deploying the Felix framework
My code is equals to basic example in ipojo page:
http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-ipojo-dosgi.html
By default, ipojo dosgi is zookeeper based, right?
The only change was @WebService annotation added in AdderService and
AdderServiceProvider.
One more question: A simple bundle can be a
Anja
I'm only a committer not the project lead, but I really can't see anyone
complaining if you help spread the knowledge by translating into your
local language, as long as the content is kept faithful after the
translation.
Apache is all about open source - so in fact, I suspect the
I agree and would just ask for a link back to the original page.
BTW: you might want to refer to the new page
http://felix.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-framework/apache-felix-framework-usage-documentation.html
Regards
Felix
Am 01.03.2013 um 05:42 schrieb Rob Walker:
Anja
Hi Dhiego,
the ipojo example does not use zookeeper based discovery. It uses a
static remote_services.xml file.
In case of zookeeper discovery this file would not be necessary.
So what you could try is run the ipojo example on Karaf like in my
tutorial
13 matches
Mail list logo
