Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

On 7/26/2017 12:35 PM, Harbs wrote: I go through many of the main points in my presentation here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FcLs0O-BWQ&index=5&list=PL4EsaSA9xpnnraJX7NzpX6eh_P95RO8Pj The rest of the presentations are probably of interest as well. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4E

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

I don’t believe donating Flash would accomplish anything (even if there were enough people to work on it). The browser providers have been gradually pushing Flash out. Without browser support, there’s no point in having a plugin. At this point, Adobe effectively has their hands tied, and EOLing

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

I go through many of the main points in my presentation here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FcLs0O-BWQ&index=5&list=PL4EsaSA9xpnnraJX7NzpX6eh_P95RO8Pj The rest of the presentations are probably of in

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

On 7/26/2017 4:28 AM, Harbs wrote: FYI: I am very close to releasing my port from Flash to FlexJS. any chance of some general metrics/background on your effort? Adobe's announcement has sent some of our clients into "end of days" hissy fits & others into "well lets plan this out" mode. it wo

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

If there are multiple engineers available who would help with security patches then sure. Adobe would not be EOL on Flash if that were cheap. If the source can be under the Apache License maybe. That first requirement is what needs to be proven. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 25,

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

adobe should just donate fp to apache, we have many apps at my company still using flex web On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Harbs wrote: > Interesting question. I’d guess that does not use the FP at all, but uses > the AIR runtime. If that’s true, it’ll probably still work. > > > On Jul 26, 201

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

Interesting question. I’d guess that does not use the FP at all, but uses the AIR runtime. If that’s true, it’ll probably still work. > On Jul 26, 2017, at 12:19 AM, Gary Yang wrote: > > What would happen without FP when loading swf files in: > > http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/refer

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

FYI: I am very close to releasing my port from Flash to FlexJS. It was a lot of work to redo much of the UI, but well over 90% of the business logic and most of the UI logic worked with minimal or no modification. I was somewhat nervous about my choice to use FlexJS to migrate my app when I st

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

What would happen without FP when loading swf files in: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/flash/html/HTMLLoader.html On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Scott Matheson wrote: > Not sure I understand your comment about flash player inside Air HTML > > I read this as

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

Not sure I understand your comment about flash player inside Air HTML I read this as the end of FP so the only option for web based apps is flashJS (which is a big port) or 100% rewrite Or am I wrong? Sent from my iPhone > On 25 Jul 2017, at 18:18, Gary Yang wrote: > > I am curious about wh

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

I am curious about what they are going to change for running flash player inside AIR HTML. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 1:07 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Looks like AIR will live on > https://forum.starling-framework.org/topic/air-roadmap-update > > On Jul 25, 2017 10:00 AM, "Gary Yang" wrote: >

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

Looks like AIR will live on https://forum.starling-framework.org/topic/air-roadmap-update On Jul 25, 2017 10:00 AM, "Gary Yang" wrote: > It didn't say anything about AIR ... > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:11 PM, rodol...@essencialcode.com.br < > rodol...@essencialcode.com.br> wrote: > > > https:

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

About AIR: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/2362234 -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flash-The-Future-of-Interactive-Content-tp15489p15491.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabb

Re: Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

It didn't say anything about AIR ... On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:11 PM, rodol...@essencialcode.com.br < rodol...@essencialcode.com.br> wrote: > https://blogs.adobe.com/conversations/2017/07/adobe-flash-update.html > > > > > --

Flash & The Future of Interactive Content

https://blogs.adobe.com/conversations/2017/07/adobe-flash-update.html -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flash-The-Future-of-Interactive-Content-tp15489.html Sent from the Apac

Re: Reg Exp help

Yes, I run just this code and it works. It maybe something else in my component. Thanks for you reply and help! -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Reg-Exp-help-tp15486p15488.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Reg Exp help

That's strange, I copied and pasted your code into FlashDevelop and ran it and traced out cText and it came out properly to "3600" Kyle McKnight Senior UI Engineer - Accesso 602.515.1444 (M) On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:16 AM, jfb wrote: > Hi All, > I am trying to replace all commas with not

Reg Exp help

Hi All, I am trying to replace all commas with nothing from a string. var cText:String = "36,000,000"; var regEx:RegExp = /,/g; cText = cText.replace(regEx,""); The result for cText is 36000,000. It is only replacing the first comma. Why the global (g) option is not working? Thanks ! -- View th