Brian, please don't worry. I wrote from Brian and Charles. Ok?
On 2012-11-24 13:13, Brian Barker wrote:
At 12:51 24/11/2012 +0900, Dr. R. O Stapf wrote:
On 2012-11-24 12:24, Brian Barker wrote:
I have no idea how many users are subscribed this list but let's just say arguendo there are
10. If
Good evening
This first message of mine and your response went through.
Yet, I tried (again, for the third time) to respond to a message from
Tom Davies.
Every time it bounces back.
When I get home, I try again from there.
Thomas
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Hi :)
It's fairly obvious that Brian didn't say it. The line with
Brian's name has just one whereas the line with the comment has
three . Obviously Brian appears to have said soemthing but that has been
chopped and someone else said the comment after but we don't know who without
going back
Hi :)
I didn't know what name people wanted so i just made it like this
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/CheatSheets
a\nd put the line at the top to add all the usual menus. I'm not sure how to
give it the standard template that automatically generates the
Table-of-Contents from
(Sent for the fourth time today ...
AND it bounced immediately!)
(2012/11/21 17:53), Tom Davies wrote:
Hi
Have you tried renaming your user profile? Is it possible the problem
is being caused by an Extension?
I'm not sure if it would be better to post a new bug-report and link
to the old
Hi :)
The important thing is getting replies to the list. Then we all get to read
them. If an individual is away or has reached the limit of their knowledge
then others can take-over and respond. Also if people have a better idea or
are aware of another possibility or notice the other person
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-11-24 12:04 AM MR wrote:
Can you take this personal argument off the list, please?
It is not a personal argument. It is a matter of principal
The way you are presenting this and attacking the author and the
On 11/24/2012 02:41 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2012-11-24 1:14 AM Jay Lozier wrote:
On 11/24/2012 01:23 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
It is not a personal argument. It is a matter of principal
What principal?
Principle. Stupid typo.
Taking someone's work without giving attribution for it is
Hi :)
+1
Everyone should (imo) be entitled to their view. Can we agree to disagree
peacefully? Perhaps we might be able to resolve some of the issues in future
threads once we are able to cool off a bit and then later look at what really
are the issues.
Regards from
Tom :)
I have recently upgraded a workstation from fedora fc16 to fc17, but the
problem remains unchanged.
Using both the fc17-provided libreoffice-*-3.5.7.2-6.fc17.x86_64.rpm's and
the downloaded 3.6.1.2 release from the Document Foundation website, there are
two problems in writer - and they are
Hi :)
This post looked good to me. If the cheat-sheet is going to have screen-shots
then at some point it might be good to take notice of what the docs team
decided for their screenshots but its not as relevant to non-printed online
documentation.
Regards from
Tom :)
YES
there will be screen shots or the whole UI and shots of what each menu
options have withing them and their options as well.
There will be needing this type of things due it is easier to see an
image with balloons with text telling people what that part is. It is
easier to use such
At 21:27 24/11/2012 +0900, Thomas Blasejewicz wrote:
This message COULD be sent in response to my own post, but NOT in
response to Mr. Davies' post. Now that the message has been posted,
it does not matter any more, but
somehow I would like to know why ...
(2012/11/21 17:53), Tom Davies
On 11/24/2012 10:10 PM, Brian Barker wrote:
At 21:27 24/11/2012 +0900, Thomas Blasejewicz wrote:
This message COULD be sent in response to my own post, but NOT in
response to Mr. Davies' post. Now that the message has been posted,
it does not matter any more, but
somehow I would like to know
14 matches
Mail list logo
