Hi :)
I think it is important to get some good comments in there quickly. It
would be good to do this to any other articles about LibreOffice too.
It is best to write more comments for articles that are properly
pro-LibreOffice so that their authors get seen positively by whoever
publishes such a
Hi :)
I got the 4.0 article from the original link too even though i'm not in the
southern hemisphere and don't have my monitor upside down either. Guess it
is another Firefox issue. Even going to the author's page and clicking on
the 5.0 link got me to the 4.0 review. Also the font size kept ju
Il 23/08/2015 14:02, donabo...@libero.it ha scritto:
Hi,
I apologize if this
is not the right place, but I am getting desperate: first, my question is
NOT showing to the users in the Ask page after 2 days I posted.
Here are the screenshot of the que
2015-08-24 16:36 GMT+02:00 toki :
> On 21/08/15 11:02, Pedro wrote:
>
> > I disagree that the UI is the biggest problem...
>
> The acid test is whether or not the UI passes or fails Section 508
> criteria.
>
> Currently, LibO fails Section 508 criteria.
> (Draw fails everything. Impress fails most
On 21/08/15 11:02, Pedro wrote:
> I disagree that the UI is the biggest problem...
The acid test is whether or not the UI passes or fails Section 508 criteria.
Currently, LibO fails Section 508 criteria.
(Draw fails everything. Impress fails most of the time.)
jonathon
--
To unsubscribe e-ma
On 08/24/2015 02:28 PM, Aurelius Octavian wrote:
Thank you Stephan for the hint. Dependency's profiling the "soffice.bin"
execution from within Java worked and I got a longer log.
However, since I'm no C(++) or Windows programmer I wouldn't know where
to search for a bug in the Java64->UNO->Libre
Thank you Stephan for the hint. Dependency's profiling the "soffice.bin"
execution from within Java worked and I got a longer log.
However, since I'm no C(++) or Windows programmer I wouldn't know where to
search for a bug in the Java64->UNO->Libreoffice64 process.
Would somebody like to take a
2015-08-21 4:15 GMT+02:00 :
> On 2015-08-20 22:10, toki wrote:
>
>> On 20/08/15 10:12, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>>
>> I should get a job writing these kinds of reviews
>>>
>>
>> Why are you assuming that a human-being wrote the review?
>> It has most of the hallmarks of a bot-written review.
>>
On 08/22/2015 02:47 PM, Aurelius Octavian wrote:
With "Depends tool" do you mean the Depency Walker (depends.exe) ?
http://www.dependencywalker.com/
I didn't find another tool which would sound similar to what you mentioned.
Yes, that's what I meant.
In any case, I fail to open my Java progra