Josh Rose wrote:
I searched the user forums and support site for answers, but could not find
any. Is anyone else experiencing this?
Hi Josh,
the first thing to try is disabling hardware acceleration inside
LibreOffice - Tools-Options-View has the corresponding checkbox.
If that's fixing it,
Urmas wrote:
[expletives]
Urmas, stop this. This is now way beyond any acceptable limits.
-- Thorsten
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
Jim Seymour wrote:
Just put him in a set-and-forget filter on your email client and be
done with it. Hopefully nobody on the mailing list will have the bad
sense to copy his nonsense to the mailing list, and Urmas will be
gone from your life.
That is indeed sensible advise.
And now let's
Alex Thurgood wrote:
The dev working on LO didn't like the StarOffice binary filter code, so
they got rid of it, simple as that - they certainly didn't care whether
people who had started using the original product, the one that gave
birth both to OOo and LO, over 10 years ago would still want
Girvin R. Herr wrote:
---
CVE-2013-2189
and
---
CVE-2013-4156
Both are fixed in all current LibreOffice versions. Up-to-date
information about security fixes / advisories is always available
Guy Voets wrote:
It is nigh impossible to find a link to a place where the 3.5.7 can be
downloaded.
I also looked in the nl.libreoffice.org site... no dice!
Hi Guy,
two ways for that - either use something like
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/?type=win-x86lang=nlversion=3.5.7
leif wrote:
Half the problem is communication.
Very much to the point.
1) simply commenting a bug does _not_ remove NEEDINFO status - in
this case, only if the submitter had commented _and_ changed
status to NEW, the bugs wouldn't have been closed
2) exposing users to the
Larry Gusaas wrote:
The download page for Macs is improperly configured and says you
have to download two files, both RC2 and the release version of
3.5.4. Here is what the page currently says (Note it states it is a
pre-release version.
Yep, sorry folks, an unfortunate misconfiguration in
Jean-Francois Nifenecker wrote:
The place where to bring questions to the devs has to be a visible
and accessible place.
[...]
I guess there's some work to be done to resolve those two points.
Hi Jean-Francois,
not necessarily - what would be equally workable is a group of
change agents
Jean-Francois Nifenecker wrote:
What bothers me the more on the users lists (FR is the same for that
matter) is the recurring motto Regina sang: discussing here will
not make it appear.
Hi Jean-Francois,
well, but it's true - *someone* would need to carry the discussion
to the relevant list,
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
From: Marc Paré [mailto:m...@marcpare.com]
Thanks to all the people who answered this. It seems whether LibreOffice
is partially or completely compliant to OASIS version 1.2 is more
complicated to establish for non-dev people.
LibO is, like OOo, an extended
11 matches
Mail list logo
