[libreoffice-users] CVE-2012-0337

2012-03-23 Thread Dan Lewis
Using both LO and OOo, I'm aware of the need to patch this vulnerability for both. What I don't know is what is the status of this with respect to LO. I presently have 3.5.1-102 and 3.4.5.502. I did not see anything mentioned about this on the LO main page. It would be nice to have a statement

Re: [libreoffice-users] CVE-2012-0337

2012-03-23 Thread drew jensen
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 07:55 -0400, Dan Lewis wrote: Using both LO and OOo, I'm aware of the need to patch this vulnerability for both. What I don't know is what is the status of this with respect to LO. I presently have 3.5.1-102 and 3.4.5.502. I did not see anything mentioned about this on

Re: [libreoffice-users] CVE-2012-0337

2012-03-23 Thread Dan Lewis
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 08:10 -0400, drew jensen wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 07:55 -0400, Dan Lewis wrote: Using both LO and OOo, I'm aware of the need to patch this vulnerability for both. What I don't know is what is the status of this with respect to LO. I presently have 3.5.1-102 and

Re: [libreoffice-users] CVE-2012-0337

2012-03-23 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Dan, On Friday 23 March 2012, 08:53:54 Dan Lewis wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 08:10 -0400, drew jensen wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 07:55 -0400, Dan Lewis wrote: ... [vague security announcements] What security issues? I'm not sure I know from what I read. I tend to share your

Re: [libreoffice-users] CVE-2012-0337

2012-03-23 Thread drew jensen
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 08:53 -0400, Dan Lewis wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 08:10 -0400, drew jensen wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 07:55 -0400, Dan Lewis wrote: Using both LO and OOo, I'm aware of the need to patch this vulnerability for both. What I don't know is what is the status of this

Re: [libreoffice-users] CVE-2012-0337

2012-03-23 Thread Dan Lewis
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 12:52 -0400, drew jensen wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 08:53 -0400, Dan Lewis wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 08:10 -0400, drew jensen wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 07:55 -0400, Dan Lewis wrote: Using both LO and OOo, I'm aware of the need to patch this vulnerability

RE: [libreoffice-users] CVE-2012-0337

2012-03-23 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] CVE-2012-0337 Hi Dan, On Friday 23 March 2012, 08:53:54 Dan Lewis wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 08:10 -0400, drew jensen wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 07:55 -0400, Dan Lewis wrote: ... [vague security announcements] What security issues? I'm

RE: [libreoffice-users] CVE-2012-0337

2012-03-23 Thread Tom Davies
:) --- On Fri, 23/3/12, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: From: Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] CVE-2012-0337 To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Friday, 23 March, 2012, 17:13 This was a common vulnerability in software having lineage