On 17/03/2014, Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
Nothing happens when XML tags are ignored, to systems which are not
supporting the ODF 1.2 Extended document format. This is the reason why
we can suggest to use ODF 1.2 Extended as the preferred format, because
backward
e-letter wrote:
On 17/03/2014, Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
Nothing happens when XML tags are ignored, to systems which are not
supporting the ODF 1.2 Extended document format. This is the reason why
we can suggest to use ODF 1.2 Extended as the preferred format, because
On 16/03/2014, Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
ODF as implemented by OpenOffice and then LibreOffice has always been
the extended version, and not the strict standard version, although
it has always been possible to choose the latter. ODF become a standard
in 2006, based on OOo
On 17/03/14 11:53, e-letter wrote:
Thanks for this information. The difference between extended and
strict allows for confusion to occur. In the option
load/save,general, there is no option strict standard, only 10/11,
12, 12extended.
ODF 1.2 is the standard, and I have used strict to
ODF as implemented by OpenOffice and then LibreOffice has always been
the extended version, and not the strict standard version, although
it has always been possible to choose the latter. ODF become a standard
in 2006, based on OOo 2.0 (2005) file format, but OOo was already
shipping some
