to be a slap
in the face to these disabled folks.
From: Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:19 AM
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Nitpicking on a name
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Hello everyone,
I apologize as what I am writing about might seem like
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Nitpicking on a name
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Hello everyone,
I apologize as what I am writing about might seem like a detail to many,
but I think it hurts a bit the project in the end to leave these things as
they are.
On this list (a few others as well but esp
anne-ology wrote on 7/27/2014 3:18 PM:
silly is as silly does this is not;
rather inane, bordering on insane ;-)
OpenOffice was referred to as OO ...
LibreOffice was an offshoot of this thus LO.
[and yes, I have used this program since the days
I never us LO outside of these lists. Well except maybe a DVD volume
title like LO-NA-DVD-4.2.5, which needs abbreviations to fit
everything in.
When abbreviations are allowed or needed, then I use LO, OOo, AOO,
MSO, and things like that.
On 07/25/2014 05:10 AM, Peter Hillier-Brook
Hello everyone,
I apologize as what I am writing about might seem like a detail to many, but I
think it hurts a bit the project in the end to leave these things as they are.
On this list (a few others as well but esp. On this one) people call
LibreOffice LO. We -sorry to take on my founder's
Bravo!
On 25/07/14 08:19, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello everyone,
I apologize as what I am writing about might seem like a detail to
many, but I think it hurts a bit the project in the end to leave
these things as they are.
On this list (a few others as well but esp. On this one) people
2014-07-25 9:19 GMT+02:00 Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org:
Now you will tell me that it is easier to type LO than it is with
LibreOffice. Perhaps. But everyone here writes MS Office...
I've seen MSO used in long messages... Seeing that these messages are on
the
Hello Cley,
On 25 juillet 2014 11:17:42 CEST, Cley Faye cleyf...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-25 9:19 GMT+02:00 Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org:
Now you will tell me that it is easier to type LO than it is with
LibreOffice. Perhaps. But everyone here writes MS Office...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:37:16 +0200
Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Oh, I am not afraid of confusion. Only that we are using a weird way
to call LibreOffice and that it does not make much sense to use an
acronym.
With all due respect here, and not to shoot the
Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Now you will tell me that it is easier to type LO than it is with
LibreOffice. Perhaps. But everyone here writes MS Office...
Anyway the point I am trying to make is that LO does not mean anything and
sends the wrong message.
Le 25.07.2014 12:59, Paul a écrit :
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:37:16 +0200
Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Oh, I am not afraid of confusion. Only that we are using a weird way
to call LibreOffice and that it does not make much sense to use an
acronym.
With all due
On 07/25/2014 03:19 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello everyone,
I apologize as what I am writing about might seem like a detail to many, but I
think it hurts a bit the project in the end to leave these things as they are.
On this list (a few others as well but esp. On this one) people call
Hi Charles,
Am 25.07.2014 um 09:19 schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
Anyway the point I am trying to make is that LO does not mean
anything and sends the wrong message.
From my personal observation LO is a well established abbreviation
for LibreOffice as well as AOO, OOo, MSO are well-known
13 matches
Mail list logo
