Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-30 Thread Tom Davies
d be fixed now given all the improvements oif the last couple of years.  A definite plus for LO.  Regards from Tom :)  > > From: Jay Lozier >To: users@global.libreoffice.org >Sent: Friday, 30 November 2012, 6:19 >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-us

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-30 Thread Tom Davies
ecluttering and clearing out all the odd Extensions and settings that might be causing weird things to happen.  Regards from Tom :)  >____ > From: rost52 >To: users@global.libreoffice.org >Sent: Friday, 30 November 2012, 6:41 >Subject: Re: [lib

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-30 Thread Don Myers
On 11/29/2012 10:05 PM, Jay Lozier wrote: On 11/29/2012 11:45 AM, Chris Carlson wrote: Okay, I must be brain-dead. I misread "nabble" as "nobble." Looking at nabble, it's way more than I need if anyone want's to look at the document with which I'm having trouble. It can be downloaded from

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-30 Thread Tom Davies
's just us trying to pinpoint the problem so it can be fixed.  Congrats btw.  Nicely done and welcome in :)  Regards from Tom :)  > > From: Chris Carlson >To: users@global.libreoffice.org >Sent: Friday, 30 November 2012, 4:28 >Subject: Re:

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-29 Thread rost52
Then I should be able to open it soon when 3.6.4 will be released. Next week??? I will give it a try because I am on XP On 2012-11-30 13:28, Chris Carlson wrote: I find it really frustrating that all of you are opening the document fine. Of course you all seem to be using Linux or LO version 3

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-29 Thread Jay Lozier
On 11/29/2012 11:28 PM, Chris Carlson wrote: I find it really frustrating that all of you are opening the document fine. Of course you all seem to be using Linux or LO version 3.6. On Nov 25, I downloaded the latest version, and it was 3.5.7. Silly me to think that this is the latest version

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-29 Thread Chris Carlson
I find it really frustrating that all of you are opening the document fine. Of course you all seem to be using Linux or LO version 3.6. On Nov 25, I downloaded the latest version, and it was 3.5.7. Silly me to think that this is the latest version. So, I installed 3.6.3.2 (build 58f22d5), a

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-29 Thread Jay Lozier
On 11/29/2012 11:45 AM, Chris Carlson wrote: Okay, I must be brain-dead. I misread "nabble" as "nobble." Looking at nabble, it's way more than I need if anyone want's to look at the document with which I'm having trouble. It can be downloaded from http://beachware.org/Dec12.doc. Thanks, al

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-29 Thread Steve Edmonds
Thanks. Opens fine in my opensuse version of LO, which is I think about 3.5.4. (3.5 build 403). steve On 2012-11-30 05:45, Chris Carlson wrote: Okay, I must be brain-dead. I misread "nabble" as "nobble." Looking at nabble, it's way more than I need if anyone want's to look at the document w

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-29 Thread Chris Carlson
Okay, I must be brain-dead. I misread "nabble" as "nobble." Looking at nabble, it's way more than I need if anyone want's to look at the document with which I'm having trouble. It can be downloaded from http://beachware.org/Dec12.doc. Thanks, all, for the support. Chris On 11/27/2012 11:4

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-29 Thread Tom Davies
n >To: >Cc: LibreOffice >Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2012, 5:58 >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document > >Wow, what a lot of great responses.  Thanks, all. > >To answer a number of questions: > >I was using an older version of LO (I j

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-28 Thread Chris Carlson
Wow, what a lot of great responses. Thanks, all. To answer a number of questions: I was using an older version of LO (I just got notified when I brought it up this month that a new version was available). Both versions could not open the .doc file. The 3.5 version I am using now was updated

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-28 Thread Steve Edmonds
On 2012-11-28 19:14, Chris Carlson wrote: I'm new to this e-mail list, so excuse me if this is something discussed already. I've been very pleased with LibreOffice on many fronts. I recommend it to everyone. As a matter of fact, I use it instead of Word at every opportunity. At work, thou

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-28 Thread Tom Davies
he same now but i still do because it's easy and uncompressed Pdf prints nicely. Regards from Tom :)  > > From: Chris Carlson >To: LibreOffice >Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2012, 6:14 >Subject: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 20

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-28 Thread Declan Moriarty
, 7:41 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document On 11/28/2012 01:14 AM, Chris Carlson wrote: > I'm new to this e-mail list, so excuse me if this is something discussed > already. > > I've been very pleased with LibreOffice on many fronts.  I recom

Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-27 Thread Jay Lozier
On 11/28/2012 01:14 AM, Chris Carlson wrote: I'm new to this e-mail list, so excuse me if this is something discussed already. I've been very pleased with LibreOffice on many fronts. I recommend it to everyone. As a matter of fact, I use it instead of Word at every opportunity. At work, th

[libreoffice-users] Problem reading Word 2003 document

2012-11-27 Thread Chris Carlson
I'm new to this e-mail list, so excuse me if this is something discussed already. I've been very pleased with LibreOffice on many fronts. I recommend it to everyone. As a matter of fact, I use it instead of Word at every opportunity. At work, though, I use Word because that's what's install