Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Interesting comment about Writer Bugs in LinuxQuestions.org

2015-01-26 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) 1. I think part of the problem is that we push the latest version of the newest branch all the time. It's only experienced people or people on this list who may realise that features broken in the Fresh branch may well get fixed soon or are already still working in Still. A lot of us

[libreoffice-users] Re: Interesting comment about Writer Bugs in LinuxQuestions.org

2015-01-25 Thread CVAlkan
Hi Charles: It's all a matter of perspective I suppose. I initially interpreted the poster's remarks as tongue-in-cheek humor, that is to say something like I love her (LibreOffice) and really don't want to be separated from her, but sometimes she (Writer Impress particularly) gets on my

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Interesting comment about Writer Bugs in LinuxQuestions.org

2015-01-25 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello folks, Just one thing about the topic: we do have all sorts of unit testing... just check http://wiki.documentfoundation.org Best, Charles. Le Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:12:27 -0800, Spencer Graves spencer.gra...@prodsyse.com a écrit : Hi, Frank: Thanks for your clarification.

[libreoffice-users] Re: Interesting comment about Writer Bugs in LinuxQuestions.org

2015-01-25 Thread CVAlkan
Hi Spenser: What you're saying is certainly true, but in this case it really didn't sound like it was pro-Microsoft but rather anti-LO - a subtle difference perhaps, but I believe a significant one. The real danger, I suspect, is that, knowing we're gaining on the proprietary world, we tend to

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Interesting comment about Writer Bugs in LinuxQuestions.org

2015-01-25 Thread Spencer Graves
Hi, Frank: Thanks for your clarification. I agree on nearly all counts. What do LO developers do regarding unit testing — automated tests to confirm that certain features continue to work? I contribute to another free open-source software (FOSS) project