-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/05/2011 13:58, Roland Hughes wrote:
Professional IT workers never remove any portion of the post because
when you go through a SOX audit, and then through court, you get in a
whole lot of trouble for doing it.
For a SOX audit the important
Neither bottom nor interleaved posting methods are used by professional
IT workers. Microsoft developers yes, but not professionals.
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 20:25 -0700, NoOp wrote:
On 05/29/2011 07:42 PM, Roland Hughes wrote:
Wow!
Someone definitely peed in your cornflakes this morning!
Whether he does or doesn't represent LO in any official capacity really
doesn't matter to me. Official presence seems to be non-existent at
best on this list and believe it or not, Tom is where I got my answer.
Had the LO Web site been designed even remotely correct for a commercial
or widely
Joep,
Professional IT workers never remove any portion of the post because
when you go through a SOX audit, and then through court, you get in a
whole lot of trouble for doing it.
Now, people who once got paid for writing a program or use Microsoft
products may well have different opinions
On 2011-05-30 2:45 AM, Roland Hughes wrote:
Neither bottom nor interleaved posting methods are used by
professional IT workers. Microsoft developers yes, but not
professionals.
Rotflmao!
Roland, you are obviously from some other planet than I.
In the circles I frequent, it is the exact
Obviously you travel in that world of got paid to write a program once
instead of the three plus year multi-million dollar bet the company
systems development projects. I can tell you what world I travel in.
Remember the articles which came out in ComputerWorld and the other
trade rags after
On 2011-05-30 2:39 PM, Roland Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 14:39 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Roland, you are obviously from some other planet than I.
In the circles I frequent, it is the exact opposite.
It is the IT people who are most likely to know how to properly use
their mail
Le 28/05/11 01:53, Roland Hughes a écrit :
Hi Roland,
This plugin was one of the few reasons I bothered with OpenOffice.
Being able to write blog entries off-line using fonts and specific
layouts was awesome. It appears absolutely nothing has been done on
this since 2009. Is anybody going
There is not a single ^TY)*()(*)(ing link on the LibreOffice site to
file a bug report!!1
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 10:02 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 28/05/11 01:53, Roland Hughes a écrit :
Hi Roland,
This plugin was one of the few reasons I bothered with OpenOffice.
Hi,
On Sun, 29 May 2011 08:28:04 -0500
Roland Hughes rol...@logikalsolutions.com wrote:
There is not a single ^TY)*()(*)(ing link on the LibreOffice site to
file a bug report!!1
sorry, but you are wrong!
There is.
If you don't believe me, see for yourself:
Go to
And just how many users are going to dig that deep to find out how to
file a bug report?
___Most___ sites, including the original OpenOffice site, put file bug
report links either on the first page OR under the Support heading.
You didn't even have the decency to put it under Get Help. As a
Sent: Sun, 29 May, 2011 15:41:13
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken
And just how many users are going to dig that deep to find out how to
file a bug report?
___Most___ sites, including the original OpenOffice site, put file bug
report links either on the first page
: Sigrid Carrera sigrid.carr...@googlemail.com
To: users@libreoffice.org
Sent: Sun, 29 May, 2011 15:24:05
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken
Hi,
On Sun, 29 May 2011 08:28:04 -0500
Roland Hughes rol...@logikalsolutions.com wrote:
There is not a single ^TY)*()(*)(ing
Despite being longtime user of OOo and Libo, I never report any bugs. I
think even very complicated. I think we could get something more simple
that would work from within LibreOffice.
Here in Brazil we have an example with CoGrOO Community. CoGrOO is a
grammar checker developed by students at
:)
From: lcoluiggi lcolui...@gmail.com
To: users@libreoffice.org
Sent: Sun, 29 May, 2011 16:13:10
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken
Despite being longtime user of OOo and Libo, I never report any bugs. I
think even very complicated. I
On 05/29/2011 08:09 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Things are not perfect yet. We do need people to point out faults so that we
can fix them. Of course we are going to be slightly over-sensitive to
criticism
when we care so much about the project but we need to get beyond that and
just
Wow!
Someone definitely peed in your cornflakes this morning!
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 19:08 -0700, NoOp wrote:
On 05/29/2011 08:09 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Things are not perfect yet. We do need people to point out faults so that
we
can fix them. Of course we are going to be
On 05/29/2011 07:42 PM, Roland Hughes wrote:
Wow!
Someone definitely peed in your cornflakes this morning!
Try bottom or interleaved posting some time.
peed in your cornflakes?
My *point* is that Tom Davies is replying to users on this list as if he
represents LO. New users to this list may
On 05/29/2011 08:25 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 05/29/2011 07:42 PM, Roland Hughes wrote:
Wow!
Someone definitely peed in your cornflakes this morning!
Try bottom or interleaved posting some time.
peed in your cornflakes?
My *point* is that Tom Davies is replying to users on this list as if
NoOp wrote (30-05-11 05:25)
My *point* is that Tom Davies is replying to users on this list as if he
represents LO. New users to this list may be inclined to think that the
we in his posts are coming from some 'official' LO source.
Tom not only brings in confusion about who he represents,
20 matches
Mail list logo
