Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: resolved (Re: getting LO source)

2017-11-09 Thread jonathon
On 11/09/2017 05:28 PM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Errm, seriously, not really, other than perhaps just focussing on one area of > the code. :( > thereby making it difficult to have increasing in-depth knowledge and > insights. That knowledge kind of tends to be assumed. Not to mention that

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: resolved (Re: getting LO source)

2017-11-09 Thread James Knott
On 11/09/2017 12:28 PM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 09/11/2017 à 16:30, jonathon a écrit : > > Any pointers on how to minimise the pain of reading the code? > > Aspirin ;-) May the source be with you. ;-) -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems?

[libreoffice-users] Re: resolved (Re: getting LO source)

2017-11-09 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 09/11/2017 à 16:30, jonathon a écrit : Any pointers on how to minimise the pain of reading the code? Aspirin ;-) Errm, seriously, not really, other than perhaps just focussing on one area of the code. I tend to mostly focus on the database stuff, and have recently started looking at memory

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: resolved (Re: getting LO source)

2017-11-09 Thread jonathon
On 11/09/2017 09:04 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > As a non-developer trying to read the code for bug hunting, it has given me > migraines on many an occasion. Any pointers on how to minimise the pain of reading the code? jonathon -- To unsubscribe e-mail to:

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: resolved (Re: getting LO source)

2017-11-09 Thread Mike Scott
On 09/11/17 09:04, Alexander Thurgood wrote: Le 08/11/2017 à 10:52, Mike Scott a écrit : Hi Mike, Having established it would build and run (with the same video problem, incidentally), I finally looked at the sources. Now I begin to see why changes take so long not a comment in sight for

[libreoffice-users] Re: resolved (Re: getting LO source)

2017-11-09 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 08/11/2017 à 10:52, Mike Scott a écrit : Hi Mike, > Having established it would build and run (with the same video problem, > incidentally), I finally looked at the sources. Now I begin to see why > changes take so long not a comment in sight for one thing, and a > spider's web of