-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2013 19:33, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Open File Formats
I still have State agency people send out MSO 2010 or 2013 Word
.docx files to other agency people who still have MSO 2007 and did
not have the budget to buy 2010 or 2013.
Twelve (TWELVE!!!) years ago I asked OpenOffice users “Are you
advocating OO correctly..
Continues on my blog:
http://stop.zona-m.net/2013/11/shall-we-waste-twelve-more-years-promoting-free-office-suites-instead-of-open-office-formats/
Feedback very welcome, of course!
Marco
--
To
Interesting article, and indeed it is true that the file format is the
most important aspect of the office suite debate, but I think you are a
little naive in your assumption that LO should stop doing any other
type of marketing.
Firstly, the question of a truly open and compatible format *is*
On 11/09/2013 12:59 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
Twelve (TWELVE!!!) years ago I asked OpenOffice users “Are you
advocating OO correctly..
Continues on my blog:
http://stop.zona-m.net/2013/11/shall-we-waste-twelve-more-years-promoting-free-office-suites-instead-of-open-office-formats/
Feedback
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 14:33 -0500, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
On 11/09/2013 12:59 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
Twelve (TWELVE!!!) years ago I asked OpenOffice users “Are you
advocating OO correctly..
Continues on my blog:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 21:25:19 PM +0200, Paul wrote:
Interesting article, and indeed it is true that the file format is
the most important aspect of the office suite debate, but I think
you are a little naive in your assumption that LO should stop doing
any other type of marketing.
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 15:20:49 PM -0500, Jay Lozier wrote:
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 14:33 -0500, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
There are two different topics here.
1 - Open File Formats - ODF
2 - Free and Open Source Software office suites - LO and OOo/AOO
Kracked_P_P
that is true. But
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:39:00 +0100
M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net wrote:
Firstly, the question of a truly open and compatible format *is*
used when discussing the problems with MSO. Secondly, we are so few,
that...
these are the SAME answers that ruled the scene in 2001. My point is
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 23:29:01 PM +0200, Paul wrote:
Also, I don't think the current situation could have been any better,
no matter what argument we used. The fact that it is changing at all is
testimony to our dedication in spreading all the good arguments for Open
Source and ODF. This is,
