-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/01/15 11:16, Brian Barker wrote:
So you mean that you give them the information that you are
prepared to be dishonest?
Some sites that request that information, have a note buried somewhere
that they _expect_ people to give inaccurate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/01/15 13:27, Alan B wrote:
I'm not familiar with a forum like that (esp the no registration, no
passwords part).
I've come across a couple of forums that meet those two specifications.
They either are spam havens, of the moderators work
Hi :)
When websites ask for my DoB i use a fake one. I try to use the same
fake one for all websites to make it easier to remember. Similarly
with other bits of private information.
Regards from
Tom :)
On 15 January 2015 at 18:35, Rob Jasper r...@famjasper.nl wrote:
Please keep the 'old'
At 08:29 16/01/2015 +, Tom Davies wrote:
When websites ask for my DoB i use a fake one. I try to use the same
fake one for all websites to make it easier to remember. Similarly
with other bits of private information.
So you mean that you give them the information that you are prepared
to
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:07 PM, dave boland dbola...@fastmail.fm wrote:
What is easy and convenient? I thought I answered that. Quick to do,
no reistration, no passwords, able to see the appends in a thred like
Yes, you did say that before. I'm not familiar with a forum like that (esp
the
The problem with gmane.org is that I can't seem to append to a thread.
I can follow the thread, so it is somewhat helpful.
What is easy and convenient? I thought I answered that. Quick to do,
no reistration, no passwords, able to see the appends in a thred like
newsgroups do, the abbility to
Please keep the 'old' stuff also. I am worried about privacy and therefore I do
not have a facebook account (and in fact I almost don't have any accounts on
more or less public things like that).
So, fully changing to whatever new things is in my opinion not a good idea.
Any system which
hello Rob,
we are expanding our suppprt options, not changing them in any way. As always
it is important to remind everyone that all this is only possible through the
help of volunteers. If you are interested please let us know.
Thanks,
Charles.
On 15 janvier 2015 19:35:42 CET, Rob Jasper
All,
I'm more than a little frustrated/angry at the support options for LO.
The choice seems to be between:
* A web interface that requires a log on to yet another service I don't
have or want to have.
* A Nabble interface that requires registration and one of those damn
captia codes that
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:49 PM, dave boland dbola...@fastmail.fm wrote:
I'm more than a little frustrated/angry at the support options for LO.
Can't we find a way to offer support that is easy and convenient? I get
Dave, I think easy and convenient is pretty much in the eye of the
On 14/01/15 21:49, dave boland wrote:
All,
I'm more than a little frustrated/angry at the support options for LO.
The choice seems to be between:
* A web interface that requires a log on to yet another service I don't
have or want to have.
* A Nabble interface that requires registration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Le Thu, 15 Jan 2015 03:40:03 +,
jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/01/15 21:49, dave boland wrote:
Can't we find a way to offer support that is easy and convenient?
What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/01/15 21:49, dave boland wrote:
Can't we find a way to offer support that is easy and convenient?
What do you consider to be _easy_ and _convenient_?
that new groups are considered old fashioned, but they work very well,
If new groups is a
13 matches
Mail list logo
