To: Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012, 7:49
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] record changes weakness compared to m$
On 19/12/2012, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
I have never seen anyone use this feature in MSO (or LO). IMHO most
On 12/20/2012 02:49 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 19/12/2012, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
I have never seen anyone use this feature in MSO (or LO). IMHO most
people find the it confusing or annoying. What seemed to work best for
most collaborative documents was to have one person be
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Would an acceptable work-around be to send 2 versions of the document? The old and the new?
In 'most' (?) cases people would hopefully already have the old version, or an even older one. Then hopefully the
Compare Documents feature in the
On 20/12/2012, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
If I am writing code I almost certainly would not use LO but either an
IDE or an enhanced text editor. The formating I need is to highlight
syntax and possible syntactical errors as I enter the code.
Understood, but the point being made is
On 20/12/2012, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I trust there's no surprise that the OASIS Standard ODF documents are
developed and maintained as ODF documents. Tracked changes are critical to
the work of the ODF TC and the review processes that the work goes through.
In
Readers,
Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature
of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple
products available to produce ODF files, but I digress). There are
many bugs concerning this feature, which is surprising.
In the typical collaborative
: [libreoffice-users] record changes weakness compared to m$
Readers,
Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature
of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple
products available to produce ODF files, but I digress). There are
many bugs concerning
@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2012, 8:26
Subject: [libreoffice-users] record changes weakness compared to m$
Readers,
Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature
of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple
products available to produce ODF
...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2012, 8:26
Subject: [libreoffice-users] record changes weakness compared to m$
Readers,
Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature
of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple
Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
The track changes thing is far too advanced for most office workers i
know of. When i tried to get people into it they complained that all the
red crossings out and different colours was all t confusing.
I have never seen anyone use this feature in
In the legal field, the track changes feature is used a lot. Typically,
one lawyer will draft a document, and send it off to another for revision.
The document will go back and forth several times, with each lawyer adding
his own changes. The track changes feature is most important. It actually
: e-letter inp...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2012, 8:26
Subject: [libreoffice-users] record changes weakness compared to m$
Readers,
Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature
of the word processor. (It's excellent
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Felmon Davis wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Bobby kneisel wrote:
Unfortunately, where I work, this feature is used heavily ( and yest it is
really, really annoying) but is considered a must have for our
environment.
Bobby Kneisel
I wouldn't call it 'must-have' in my
.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
To: 'Robert Funnell' robert.funn...@mcgill.ca; users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2012, 23:19
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] record changes weakness compared to m
but it's close.
F.
From: Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
To: 'Robert Funnell' robert.funn...@mcgill.ca; users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2012, 23:19
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] record changes weakness compared to m$
I
On 19/12/2012, Bobby kneisel bobby.knei...@ktechsolutionsllc.com wrote:
Unfortunately, where I work, this feature is used heavily ( and yest it is
really, really annoying) but is considered a must have for our environment.
In this case there is no alternative but to use m$?
--
For
On 19/12/2012, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
I have never seen anyone use this feature in MSO (or LO). IMHO most
people find the it confusing or annoying. What seemed to work best for
most collaborative documents was to have one person be responsible for
final edits after getting input
17 matches
Mail list logo
