Le 2011-10-05 03:30, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
From: Marc Paré [mailto:m...@marcpare.com]
Thanks to all the people who answered this. It seems whether LibreOffice
is partially or completely compliant to OASIS version 1.2 is more
complicated to establish for non-dev
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
From: Marc Paré [mailto:m...@marcpare.com]
Thanks to all the people who answered this. It seems whether LibreOffice
is partially or completely compliant to OASIS version 1.2 is more
complicated to establish for non-dev people.
LibO is, like OOo, an extended
Thank you for the link, Thorsten (I can't CC you because Nabble doesn't allow
that)
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
LibO is, like OOo, an extended conformance producer/consumer of
ODF1.2, in its default setup. Choosing ODF format version 1.2 in
Tools-Options-Load/Save-General makes it produce
Hi :)
As Thorsten said, almost any case of non-conformance is considered a bug.
There are some bug-reports posted about specific examples of non-conformance
which get posted when people find examples of non-conformance and feel up to
the challenge of posting a bug-report about it.
Many
Tom wrote:
Many programs don't fully comply with their own specs.
The fact that many programs do that makes it correct?
Tom wrote:
OpenSource ones tend to try to fix that through bug-reports and such-like.
We often grumble when we find an example of a proprietary program, such as
Hi Tom
Tom wrote:
We are making a big fuss about very trivial differences.
How do you know they are trivial? In the document I referred previously in
this topic, after conversion to ODF, which took me a few hours, opening in
Abiword 2.9.1 or Textmaker 2012 (Beta) is useless.
The only
orcmid comment=below /
-Original Message-
From: Marc Paré [mailto:m...@marcpare.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 03:35
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Cc: disc...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
[ ... ]
Thanks to all the
Marc asks: How conformant is LibreOffice as a producer and consumer
of the OASIS ODF 1.2 Standard?
I don't know how to assess that. I assume it is reasonably
conformant and that most documents that happen to be produced
are satisfactory to consumers that accept ODF 1.0/1.1 also.
I don't know if
: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Cc: disc...@documentfoundation.org
Date: Monday, 3 October, 2011, 1:52
Marc asks: How conformant is LibreOffice as a producer and consumer
of the OASIS ODF 1.2 Standard?
I don't know how to assess that. I assume
Hi :)
All releases of LibreOffice have used the 1.2 (Extended) by default. I think
OpenOffice was using it for quite a long time before that too. I think the
only program that still uses the older 1.1 or 1.0 formats is MS Office 2010. I
think Google-docs, KOffice, Calligra, AbiWord Gnumeric
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011, Tom Davies wrote:
All releases of LibreOffice have used the 1.2 (Extended) by default. I
think OpenOffice was using it for quite a long time before that too. I
think the only program that still uses the older 1.1 or 1.0 formats is
MS Office 2010. I think Google-docs,
Pedro wrote (01-10-11 11:39)
Am I correct to assume that ODF 1.2 is backward compatible? I.e. an old
application will still be able to open a ODF 1.2 document?
Yes. Of course, some content (from the new standard) may be wrong.
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
For unsubscribe
-
From: Tom Davies [mailto:tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 04:56
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
Hi :)
All releases of LibreOffice have used the 1.2 (Extended) by default. I think
OpenOffice was using
Whether a down-level software version will even accept an ODF 1.2 document as
if it is a down-level document and do the best it can is not something the ODF
specifications address. It depends on the down-level product.
It probably works with OpenOffice.org versions, but maybe not with other
Q: Am I correct to assume that ODF 1.2 is backward compatible? I.e. an old
application will still be able to open a ODF 1.2 document?
A: It depends. There are provisions in ODF 1.2 that, if exercised in an ODF
1.2, make it unlikely that an ODF 1.1 consumer could handle it properly. Also,
the
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011, Tom Davies wrote:
All releases of LibreOffice have used the 1.2 (Extended) by default. I
think OpenOffice was using it for quite a long time before that too. I
think the only program that still uses
A while back, Microsoft offered a warranty with regard to ODF 1.2 support. I
believe it is contingent on ISO standardization occurring. There is also an
announcement that Microsoft would provide information on its ODF 1.2 support on
the occasion of a Plugfest in Brussels this coming April.
Pedro. I agree that it would be more useful to have the choice of ODF version
be available in the Save As ... dialog. There could still be a default, of
course, and there are nice ways to reflect that in the Save As ... also.
That is not about the ODF specification of course.
It sounds like a
...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 10:36
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
A while back, Microsoft offered a warranty with regard to ODF 1.2 support. I
believe it is contingent on ISO standardization occurring
19 matches
Mail list logo
