Hi Pier,
Le 2012-08-11 06:28, yahoo-pier_andreit a écrit :
Thanks mark and steve, sorry for the late but here there is a beautyful
sun and see and beach and girls... :-)) and I'm taking advantage of
them, I will try splix. Thnx again, ciao :-))
my samsung clp-320n isn't in the splix List of
I'm on an iMac running Mountain Lion (Mac OS X 10.8.0).
I just replaced my previous installation of LibreOffice 3.3.4
(Build:401) with 3.6.0.4 (Build:104). 3.3.4 was working fine. 3.6.0.4
crashes on startup.
I'm not seeing other posts about this on th, so maybe It's Just Me [TM].
--
For
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
(so-called Reply to mangling has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other
words, with any e-mail client, replies to e-mails on the list were
automatically sent
Hello,
I suspect a bug has entered the word count. I tested some texts and found
serious differences between the number of words LibO 3.6 (3.6.0.4 to be
exact) gives and the real number (as given by LibO 3.5).
A text of 1200 words only has 660, a 7000 word text gives a 4900 count.
Some paragraphs
Guy Voets wrote:
Hello,
I suspect a bug has entered the word count. I tested some texts and found
serious differences between the number of words LibO 3.6 (3.6.0.4 to be
exact) gives and the real number (as given by LibO 3.5).
A text of 1200 words only has 660, a 7000 word text gives a 4900
Everytime I press ctrl+c or ctrl+v Writer freeze and collaps. Any ideas?
--
Jacob Octavius Jarlskov
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
On 08/06/2012 01:01 PM, carlamar...@xmsnet.nl wrote:
Yes thank you, I found the keys, but I tried to eliminate the white lines
using them and the way I did it did not work. I tried to type ^$^$ and
replace it with ^$, but it gave an error.
Carla
Please forget anything that Tom Davies told
Just testing;
and find this may be the silliest way of setting a list I've seen.
If someone cannot take the minute time to check the 'to' 'cc' 'bcc'
then the 'subject' line, then are they smart enough to operate a machine
;-)
or to handle any secure documents
I've noticed this phenomenon since OO ;-)
I've never thought much about it, but have noticed that when I check
'properties' to be sure it is the way I wish it for some document, that the
# of pages/# words varies in OO/LO from when it's sent to a MSFT document
;-)
I figured
At 18:31 12/08/2012 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
changed (so-called Reply to mangling has been disabled).
Well done!
This new way fails safe. A message intended to be public may get
sent privately by mistake - a minor
What sort of document are you working on? That happened to me when I
selected a paragraph that had over 10 , 00 words in it but it was
resolved by a re-installation of LO. also what os is this problem
occurring on?
oh and the LO version please!
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, at 10:57 PM, Jacob Octavius
I quite like this idea of change as it now seems that less mistakes
should be made!
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, at 01:33 AM, Brian Barker wrote:
At 18:31 12/08/2012 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
changed (so-called Reply to mangling
12 matches
Mail list logo
