Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [pt-br-usuarios] Estudantes da rede estadual de SP terão Office gratuito para até 5 PCs após parceria

2013-11-04 Thread Les Howell
On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 16:39 -0500, Doug wrote:
 On 11/03/2013 02:06 PM, Upscope wrote:
  On Saturday, November 02, 2013 12:46:43 PM Urmas wrote:
  Les Howell:
 
  Just a simple question, Do you know who originally designed Microsoft
  Office?
 
  Microsoft mostly.
 
 
 /snip/
 
  Thats not totally correct if I remember right. Office started out as a 
  joint project between IBM and Microsoft for the original PC. There was a 
  differnet of directions and MS wnd IBM went there own ways. MS took a 
  lot of the joint developemt (Stole) with them. we used to use Wordstar 
  on or PC's.
  
  Russ
  
 
 It wasn't originally MS Office, it was just MS Word. It ran on DOS,
 just like WordStar, but it had some basic word-processing functions
 listed at the bottom, and it worked with a mouse, if I recall, which
 WordStar did not. WordStar required a bunch of ctrl-x functions, where
 x was some keyboard letter. This was, I believe, derived from
 Teletype terminal days, where some k/b functions we expect, even some
 found on a typewriter, didn't exist. Functions on a modern k/b, like
 the up/down/left/right arrows were implemented by ctrl-x. Even
 backspace, which doesn't exist on a teletype machine--ctrl-h will
 do it. Even on a few programs today, but not T/Bird--I just tried!
 I think Word was the first word processor to use a mouse, but I could
 be wrong. After memorizing all the control functions in WordStar,
 I stayed with it for quite a while, until WordPerfect came out.
 I still won't use Word--WP is better, imho. I wish it were still
 available for Linux.
 
 --doug
 
 -- 
 Blessed are the peacemakers..for they shall be shot at from both sides.
 --A.M.Greeley
 
Actually Wordstar used control-J to access various functions.  It was
designed that way to eliminate the need to take your hands off the home
row.  If you were proficient with Wordstar and a touch typist, you were
about 10-15% percent faster than someone using Word.  Many newspaper
reporters used it just for that reason.  Microsoft hated the competition
and so captured the control-J function (which happens to be a line
feed.)  This meant that the Windows systems would not run Wordstar.

Wordstar also had WYSIWYG using these sequences to display the various
superscript, and subscript and other characters, including the math
characters and of course the nice 1/2 and  1/4 symbols as well.
Wordstar came with Mailmerge and was a wonderful package for people
doing newsletters or other mass mail programs.

I hated that microsoft trapped the control J sequence and made it
impossible to use Wordstar.  The Wordstar team worked out a new
interface, but just as they released it, Microsoft made another low
level change to the windows interface that made the Wordstar team have
to create yet another work around, missing the market window.  And
losing the ability to not have to use a mouse for the 80% composting
task.

Word was similar to another word processing program, but I can no longer
remember its name.  The spreadsheet was a purchase, which Microsoft
reengineered and added some features and removed some to make it
compatible with their GUI, and they also changed the storage style,
which originally was all text based.  I don't remember all the changes
now.  I used that original spreadsheet, It was called supercalc or
something like that.

Personally I wish Wordstar was still available, before the MOUSE ruined
touch typing.

But word processors are subject to the whims of taste.  I also did some
formal materials for marketing.  I used a Macintosh with a simple text
editor and a program called Ready, Set, Go which was a separate
typesetting program, which included the ability to embed 3 to 6 layer
color graphics with a WYSIWYG on a Macintosh, but that was in the 1987
time frame I think.

The calendar application was similar to the calendar with events that
was part of the Wordstar package as well, but Microsoft embedded theirs
into Outlook about 1990 something.  Wordstar was a full suite if you got
all the options, and could do many things that Word didn't begin to
accomplish until about 1995.

The reason I brought this up is because wordprocessing has been around a
very long time.  Unix had some nice packages prior to 1984, and I used
some of them while I was still in the Navy.   But with the demise of
Wordstar, I just gave up and started using the mouse.  The mouse makes
the job both faster to learn and much slower to use, but that seems to
be the way of the world.

We all have our preferences.

Regards,
Les H


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging Users in the LibreOffice Project

2013-11-04 Thread Virgil Arrington
I haven't read all of this discussion in line-by-line detail, so forgive me 
if I'm unduly repetitive.


In my experience (government lawyer), larger organizations tend to prefer 
MSO over the free LO for several reasons.


1. Job Security. The old saying for IT Managers used to be, Nobody ever got 
fired for buying IBM. Likewise, IT professionals will always feel safe in 
buying MSO. At least here in America, I think most IT managers would 
consider it a risky deal to move everyone in the organization to LO.


2. Compatibility. Back in the DOS days, I was the only lawyer in our office 
using PC-Write (still my all time favorite word processor). It didn't matter 
then, because we didn't have networks or share digital files. Now, 
everything gets shared back and forth over and over. I've tried doing with 
different programs (MSO to OOo, MSO to WP, WP to MSO), etc. At the end of 
the day, all the attempts at file conversion never worked good enough. 
Something always got lost in the translation and, over time, the files got 
irreparably corrupted. I ended up keeping many programs on my computer so I 
could always use whatever my counterpart was using. Sorry to say it, but MS 
has the advantage of inertia. People buy it because people buy it, and as 
long as people keep buying it, people will buy it.


Large corporations or government offices don't care about software licensing 
costs. It's just the cost of doing business. This is different for home 
users. I have *never* paid money for an office suite on my home computers. 
I've used everything from MS Works, PerfectWorks, (both of which came 
bundled with my computers) along with StarOffice, OpenOffice.org, and LO.


As to features, both MSO and LO have far more features than any single 
person will ever need. Number of features isn't the issue. The issue is 
whether a program has the features *I* need to get today's task completed. 
Since software is published for a wide range of different users, programs 
tend to grow in an attempt to meet as many different needs as possible.


For me, LO's niche is in providing a cost effective office suite for home 
users or smaller businesses where cost is, indeed, an issue. But, I agree 
with Ken that being free isn't enough for LO to overtake MSO.


Virgil






-Original Message- 
From: Ken Springer

Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2013 10:15 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging Users in the LibreOffice Project

On 11/3/13 6:49 PM, jonathon wrote:

On 11/03/2013 04:32 PM, Ken Springer wrote:

Using a feature by feature comparison, there is no way LO or Kingsoft is 
serious competition for Office Pro.


A point you are missing, is that even in a corporate environment, all of
the parts offered by MSO Pro are not needed by all of the employees who
use the office suite.


But in total, all parts offered by MSO Pro may be used by someone in the
company.

Regardless, that's irrelevant to the discussion.  That discussion is
which MSO offering is LO nearest to.


If it was cheaper for the company to buy three quarters of the staff MSO
home edition, and a quarter MSO business edition, and a quarter MSO Pro,
they would do that.


But they can't.  So it's moot.


Microsoft's cheapest business license is for MSO Pro.
Assuming it is still offered, the most expensive license is for MSO
Enterprise edition.


MSO Enterprise may be available, but it's not on the website.  Didn't
spend a lot of time searching, but found no Enterprise 2013.


If you want to compare office suite with office suite, MSO Enterprise
Edition is the only thing on the market, that offers all of the
programs, from the same software maker.  All of the other, similar
solutions, use packages form several different software vendors.


I'm missing something here, would you expand on this?


( I don't know if Microsoft still offers MSO Enterprise Edition. Back
when the business I was working at looked at it, it was not listed on
the Microsoft Product Page alongside the other MSO offerings.)


If you want to entice people to switch from Product X to LO, you not
only have to be as good as Product X, you have to be a Helluva lot 
better.

To be serious competition, you just have to be roughly as good.



Those are standards I do not accept.  You should aspire to be the best
you can be, not just good enough.  Yugos were good enough.


Good enough is the mortal enemy of superior.


Not in the long run, if you want to be, for lack of a better phrase, in
first place.  Sooner or later, someone kicks your butt off the pedestal.

Au contraire, my friend, as I just pointed out with the charts above, LO 
is competition to the mid-level version of Office only.


For 80% of the MSO user base, MSO Pro is overkill, which is why LO is a
more appropriate option that MSO Pro.


That depends on the users needs.  While I agree with your many will buy
Pro when it's not needed, that's also irrelevant to the discussion.

Ford doesn't just 

[libreoffice-users] [Calc] Combining data coming from several sheets into a single sheet

2013-11-04 Thread gordom

Hallo everyone.
I have a Calc document consisting of dozens of sheets. Each sheet has 
several rows (the number varies) and 4 columns of text strings. Now I 
need to combine all these text into one single sheet. Every next sheet 
(group of records) must be added bellow the previous one. Not only that, 
but I have to add an extra column with the reference to the name of the 
sheet that each record (text string) originally comes from. How can I 
achieve that? I would appreciate any help. Best regards,

gordom

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Language Finnish W764 want Swedish version

2013-11-04 Thread Fredrik Jordas
Hello, have some problem to download a Swedish version of Libreoffice in my
Finnish version of Windows7-64.

Have downloaded to many of my friends LibreOffice in a Swedish version, in
geography Finland Windows in Swedish.. Unfortenely not in my own computer
whwre the Windows is FI based.. Finland is a 2 language country, we use
Finnish and Swedish.
Hope ..
Thanks for ..
FJ

I don't know the problem, I am just use a computer as a tool.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] [Calc] Combining data coming from several sheets into a single sheet

2013-11-04 Thread Jay Lozier
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 18:30 +0100, gordom wrote: 
 Hallo everyone.
 I have a Calc document consisting of dozens of sheets. Each sheet has 
 several rows (the number varies) and 4 columns of text strings. Now I 
 need to combine all these text into one single sheet. Every next sheet 
 (group of records) must be added bellow the previous one. Not only that, 
 but I have to add an extra column with the reference to the name of the 
 sheet that each record (text string) originally comes from. How can I 
 achieve that? I would appreciate any help. Best regards,
 gordom
 
Gordom,

You can use the following formula to reference the data in another
sheet:
If the final sheet is named output and the data is in a sheet named
data_2012, in any cell in output enter =data_2012.cellreference. The
cellreference is A1, B3 etc.


-- 
Jay Lozier
jsloz...@gmail.com


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] [Calc] Combining data coming from several sheets into a single sheet

2013-11-04 Thread gordom

W dniu 2013-11-04 18:53, Jay Lozier pisze:

On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 18:30 +0100, gordom wrote:

Hallo everyone.
I have a Calc document consisting of dozens of sheets. Each sheet has
several rows (the number varies) and 4 columns of text strings. Now I
need to combine all these text into one single sheet. Every next sheet
(group of records) must be added bellow the previous one. Not only that,
but I have to add an extra column with the reference to the name of the
sheet that each record (text string) originally comes from. How can I
achieve that? I would appreciate any help. Best regards,
gordom


Gordom,

You can use the following formula to reference the data in another
sheet:
If the final sheet is named output and the data is in a sheet named
data_2012, in any cell in output enter =data_2012.cellreference. The
cellreference is A1, B3 etc.




It seems I didn't express myself clearly enough. What I want to achieve 
is one single sheet consisting of all text strings (that are originally 
located in different sheets) together with the name of the sheet where 
each string was originally located.


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] [Calc] Combining data coming from several sheets into a single sheet

2013-11-04 Thread Jay Lozier

On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 19:06 +0100, gordom wrote:
 W dniu 2013-11-04 18:53, Jay Lozier pisze:
  On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 18:30 +0100, gordom wrote:
  Hallo everyone.
  I have a Calc document consisting of dozens of sheets. Each sheet has
  several rows (the number varies) and 4 columns of text strings. Now I
  need to combine all these text into one single sheet. Every next sheet
  (group of records) must be added bellow the previous one. Not only that,
  but I have to add an extra column with the reference to the name of the
  sheet that each record (text string) originally comes from. How can I
  achieve that? I would appreciate any help. Best regards,
  gordom
 
  Gordom,
 
  You can use the following formula to reference the data in another
  sheet:
  If the final sheet is named output and the data is in a sheet named
  data_2012, in any cell in output enter =data_2012.cellreference. The
  cellreference is A1, B3 etc.
 
 
 
 It seems I didn't express myself clearly enough. What I want to achieve 
 is one single sheet consisting of all text strings (that are originally 
 located in different sheets) together with the name of the sheet where 
 each string was originally located.
 

Cut and pasting will work with page delete, if a bit tedious.

Otherwise a macro that automates the cut and pasting with empty page delete.

-- 
Jay Lozier
jsloz...@gmail.com


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Language Finnish W764 want Swedish version

2013-11-04 Thread Kolbjørn Stuestøl

Den 04.11.2013 18:16, skreiv Fredrik Jordas:
I solved it by opening the http://www.libreoffice.org/download site and 
a bit down the side you find Not the version you wanted?. Click on 
Change the language and then on the wanted language in the new window 
opened.

Kolbjoern


Hello, have some problem to download a Swedish version of Libreoffice in my
Finnish version of Windows7-64.

Have downloaded to many of my friends LibreOffice in a Swedish version, in
geography Finland Windows in Swedish.. Unfortenely not in my own computer
whwre the Windows is FI based.. Finland is a 2 language country, we use
Finnish and Swedish.
Hope ..
Thanks for ..
FJ

I don't know the problem, I am just use a computer as a tool.




--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] please test probably bug in calc: W isn't shown in font 24 if a number follow it

2013-11-04 Thread yahoo-pier_andreit

using Version 4.0:build-30 on opensuse 12.3

write W2 in cell A1
choose font liberation sans
choose font size 24
in cell A1 only  2 is visible, W is invisible
I tried with many fonts and it happens only with size 24
I tried with other numbers after W and it happens also

would you please to test in your systems???

thanx, ciao :-) pier

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] please test probably bug in calc: W isn't shown in font 24 if a number follow it

2013-11-04 Thread M Henri Day
2013/11/4 yahoo-pier_andreit pier_andr...@yahoo.it

 using Version 4.0:build-30 on opensuse 12.3

 write W2 in cell A1
 choose font liberation sans
 choose font size 24
 in cell A1 only  2 is visible, W is invisible
 I tried with many fonts and it happens only with size 24
 I tried with other numbers after W and it happens also

 would you please to test in your systems???

 thanx, ciao :-) pier


​Ciao Pier,

I've tried this manoeuvre using Version: 4.1.3.2 Build ID:
410m0(Build:2) on​

​my system, Linux Mint 15, and both the «W» and the «2» are visible in cell
A1 using Liberation Sans at 24 points

Henri

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] please test probably bug in calc: W isn't shown in font 24 if a number follow it

2013-11-04 Thread Jay Lozier
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 19:59 +0100, yahoo-pier_andreit wrote: 
 using Version 4.0:build-30 on opensuse 12.3
 
 write W2 in cell A1
 choose font liberation sans
 choose font size 24
 in cell A1 only  2 is visible, W is invisible
 I tried with many fonts and it happens only with size 24
 I tried with other numbers after W and it happens also
 
 would you please to test in your systems???
 
 thanx, ciao :-) pier
 
Pier

Using openSUSE 12.3

I can not verify the problem with either LO 4.1.2.3 (from LO site) and
LO 4.00m0 (Buld 305) from the repository.

-- 
Jay Lozier
jsloz...@gmail.com


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Re: Language Finnish W764 want Swedish version

2013-11-04 Thread Urmas

Fredrik Jordas:

Hello, have some problem to download a Swedish version of Libreoffice in my
Finnish version of Windows7-64.

It makes no difference, as you select the UI language during the 
installation. 




--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] [Calc] Combining data coming from several sheets into a single sheet

2013-11-04 Thread Brian Barker

At 19:06 04/11/2013 +0100, Gordom Noname wrote:

On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 18:30 +0100, Gordom Noname wrote:
I have a Calc document consisting of dozens of sheets. Each sheet 
has several rows (the number varies) and 4 columns of text strings. 
Now I need to combine all these text into one single sheet. Every 
next sheet (group of records) must be added below the previous one. 
Not only that, but I have to add an extra column with the reference 
to the name of the sheet that each record (text string) originally 
comes from. How can I achieve that?


It seems I didn't express myself clearly enough. What I want to 
achieve is one single sheet consisting of all text strings (that are 
originally located in different sheets) together with the name of 
the sheet where each string was originally located.


I think you are expecting to get Calc somehow to look through 
whatever sheets there are and discover their names - without your 
having to quote these in your single sheet.  I don't know that this 
is possible.  Here's a suggestion:


o List the other sheet names on your single sheet.
o Now you can construct references to each other sheet using this 
list of names.  Once you have concatenated whatever other details you 
need to each sheet name, you will almost certainly need to use the 
INDIRECT() function to convert the resulting string to a reference to 
the remote sheet.
o There are two ways forward from that.  Either use appropriate 
formulae - possibly including something such as VLOOKUP() - to 
retrieve and copy the data from the other sheets to the single one, 
or else simply construct your calculations on that single sheet 
differently, referring directly to the data on the other sheets 
without copying it.  (The second method may well be more reliable.)


Depending on whether you anticipate adding more sheets later, it may 
even be quicker just to copy all your material to a single sheet 
manually, of course.


I trust this helps.

Brian Barker



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [pt-br-usuarios] Estudantes da rede estadual de SP terão Office gratuito para até 5 PCs após parceria

2013-11-04 Thread P NIKOLIC
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 20:28:34 +0700
Urmas davian...@gmail.com wrote:

 Les Howell
 
  Microsoft hated the competition
  and so captured the control-J function (which happens to be a line
  feed.)  This meant that the Windows systems would not run Wordstar.
 
 That's bullshit. Ctrl+J is a shortcut for Justify and... a paragraph mark in 
 text controls.
 
  The Wordstar team worked out a new
  interface, but just as they released it, Microsoft made another low
  level change to the windows interface that made the Wordstar team have
  to create yet another work around, missing the market window.
 
 In which version it made that change? Stop spreading FUD. 
 
 
 

Obnoxious is a word that springs to mind ..



Pete .


-- 
Linux 7-of-9 3.11.6-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Oct 18 23:22:36 CEST 2013 x86_64
GNU/Linux

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] please test probably bug in calc: W isn't shown in font 24 if a number follow it

2013-11-04 Thread yahoo-pier_andreit

On 11/04/2013 08:09 PM, M Henri Day wrote:

2013/11/4 yahoo-pier_andreit pier_andr...@yahoo.it
mailto:pier_andr...@yahoo.it

using Version 4.0:build-30 on opensuse 12.3

write W2 in cell A1
choose font liberation sans
choose font size 24
in cell A1 only  2 is visible, W is invisible
I tried with many fonts and it happens only with size 24
I tried with other numbers after W and it happens also

would you please to test in your systems???

thanx, ciao :-) pier


​Ciao Pier,

I've tried this manoeuvre using Version: 4.1.3.2 Build ID:
410m0(Build:2) on​
​my system, Linux Mint 15, and both the «W» and the «2» are visible in
cell A1 using Liberation Sans at 24 points

Henri


please try to enlarge the column...:-) :-)

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1.3.2

2013-11-04 Thread Marc Grober
I guess I should first ask if you open a doc that has text formatted as
Calibri Light,  what font is it being shown as under 4.1.2.3, what is
the provenance of the Calibri Light,   have you confirmed that the font
is available for all uses and all users, and whether it is not only
activated but enabled (two different things).

Then I might suggest logging out of your account on the subject machine,
logging in with a new account, creating a new document, checking the
default font, and then typing some text and try to format it as calibri
Light. This should resolve all questions as to whether the issue has
something to do with your pre-existing preferences, non-availability as
a system, font, etc.

If no joy, download Scrivener, install and test and see if Calibri Light
shows up and is usable. If not,  then there is an issue with your font, 
if it does then you may be looking at a bug


On 11/4/13, 11:38 AM, Cliff Scott wrote:
 ** Reply to message from Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com on Sat, 2 Nov
 2013 15:29:02 -0500

 Reminder: This is on a Mac with OSx Lion (10.7.5).

 Sorry for replying to my own message, but I finally rebooted and no help. I
 removed the whole family of fonts and reinstalled them and still LO 4.1..3.2
 will not recognize Calibri Light. This is mind boggling to me since, as far
 as I can see, it sees all the other installed fonts. This may sound strange,
 but without this font I cannot use this version. This is a key font in a
 newsletter I publish.

 Please, if anyone has any ideas what can be done to make this work speak up.
 I would very much like to upgrade to the 4.1.3.2 version, but can't with this
 issue.

 Thanks for any ideas or suggestions.

 Cliff 

 Hi Y'all,

 I have been using LO 4.0.5 for some time and just installed 4.1.3.2. Opened a
 document that I had been doing in 4.0.5 and found that 4.1.3.2 doesn't see
 one of my fonts, Calibri Light. It doesn't appear in the list of fonts at
 all. Only the base Calibri appears. In 4.0.5 both the base and the Light
 appear as separate fonts in the font dropdown list. I'm running OSx 10.7.5 on
 a MacBook Pro. Checked via the Font Book app and Calibri Light appears
 normally. Validated the font and no problems were found. Interestingly
 Calibri Light was the last font I have installed. Even reinstalled it. I
 would normally reboot to make sure something wasn't just funny that would be
 corrected by rebooting, but can't do that right now. Ideas anyone? 

 Thanks.
 Cliff



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] please test probably bug in calc: W isn't shown in font 24 if a number follow it

2013-11-04 Thread Upscope
On Monday, November 04, 2013 07:59:56 PM yahoo-pier_andreit wrote:
 using Version 4.0:build-30 on opensuse 12.3
 
 write W2 in cell A1
 choose font liberation sans
 choose font size 24
 in cell A1 only  2 is visible, W is invisible
 I tried with many fonts and it happens only with size 24
 I tried with other numbers after W and it happens also
 
 would you please to test in your systems???
 
 thanx, ciao :-) pier
 
 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more:
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive:
 http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent
 to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Just tried it on openSUSE 12.2 also with :
libreOffice Calc
Version: 4.1.1.2
Build ID: 410m0(Build:2)

When I etered it , the row height was automatically increased and on 
exiting to another cell the new height was retained. Thought maybe its a 
configuration setting but I did not find one that would cause the 
problem.

Russ
-- 
openSUSE 12.3(Linux 3.11.1-3.gfeffbf9-desktop)|KDE 4.11.2
|Intel core2duo 2.5 MHZ,|8GB DDR3|GeForce 8400GS
(NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-325.15 Patched)  


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Wordstar

2013-11-04 Thread Marc Grober
And I wish I was still able to use wordstar ;-)

On 11/4/13, 3:58 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
 Urmas wrote:

 That's bullshit. Ctrl+J is a shortcut for Justify and... a paragraph mark in 
 text controls.
 Actually, WordStar had different Ctrl+key functions than Word. Yes, today, 
 Ctrl+J is a shortcut for Justify, but back in the WordStar days, Ctrl+J did 
 something different, as did most Ctrl+key combinations. Ctrl+A, for example, 
 moved the cursor one word to the left; Ctrl+F, one word to the right. Ctrl+K 
 opened up several file commands, such as Ctrl+K, P for Print. Today, these 
 seem archaic, but in the day, it was lightning quick for a good typist. To 
 make matters even better, the Ctrl key was positioned next to the “a” key, 
 where the Caps Lock key is nowadays.

 The WordStar keystrokes were copied by many other programs, such as my 
 beloved PC-Write, and VDE, and even smaller, lighter editor.

 We DOS users were slow to embrace Windows, one of the biggest reasons being 
 the dreaded mouse. Touch typists hate taking their fingers off the keyboard 
 to grab the mouse.

 The DOS camp was so dedicated that I even recall an article that argued that 
 DOS users made better writers than Windows users. The theory was that, while 
 Windows users were busy trying to pick the right font and page margins, DOS 
 users were focusing on the content of their writing. Now, today, I find 
 myself spending more time configuring and modifying styles than I do actually 
 writing.

 And, remember the blazing speed of our old 286 PCs with 20 meg. hard drives? 
 Despite today’s dual-core, multi-gigabyte monster computer, I have yet to 
 find a word processor that loads, processes, and saves files as fast as 
 PC-Write on a 1980s DOS computer. *Sigh*

 Virgil



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1.3.2

2013-11-04 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
on Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:07:45 -0500

Thanks for the reply.

 Would you tell us if it is a 
 .ttf, .otf, or some other font extension type.

It is .ttf
 
 I do not have Calibri Light, just normal, italic, bold, and
 bold-italic.  All of them are .ttf

Initally all I had in that family was the same ones as you had then found the
Light version which actually is Light and Light Italic.
 
 There was a similar font listing bug last year or early this year.  I do
 not remember which version it was that had the missing font in that Mac
 system.
 
 Is there any reason why could cannot use 4.0.5 or 4.0.6, till the font
 issues are worked out?

I can continue using 4.0.5 just fine, just wanted to upgrade and found the
problem.

 
 I had a problem with the font scroll-down dialog box for the fonts in
 4.1.2 [Ubuntu 64-bit], which was a show-stopper for me, but I am
 perfectly happy to still use 4.0.5 or 4.0.6 till they get the bug fixes
 done.
 
 
 Just to through this out,
 
 can you copy the font in the internal font folder for LO?  I know that
 there is a folder in Ubuntu/Debian for LO fonts
 
 /etc/libreoffice4.0/share/fonts/truetype/
 
 There are 69 fonts and a file called fc_local.conf in that folder.
 
 So I wonder if your Mac has a similar root folder for LibreOffice,
 there might be a place there to copy that font to so it is within LO's
 internal list of fonts and not looking for the font folder that
 shares fonts with all of the installed packages.

Same thing on the Mac. Same files in that folder also. I tried adding the
font files to that directory with no joy. Probably needs some process to
install so it can see them.

Guess I'll have to file a bug as it makes no sense to have the font appear in
one version and not in the other.

Cliff
 
 
 
 On 11/04/2013 03:38 PM, Cliff Scott wrote:
  ** Reply to message from Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com on Sat, 2 Nov
  2013 15:29:02 -0500
 
  Reminder: This is on a Mac with OSx Lion (10.7.5).
 
  Sorry for replying to my own message, but I finally rebooted and no help. I
  removed the whole family of fonts and reinstalled them and still LO 4.1..3.2
  will not recognize Calibri Light. This is mind boggling to me since, as far
  as I can see, it sees all the other installed fonts. This may sound strange,
  but without this font I cannot use this version. This is a key font in a
  newsletter I publish.
 
  Please, if anyone has any ideas what can be done to make this work speak up.
  I would very much like to upgrade to the 4.1.3.2 version, but can't with 
  this
  issue.
 
  Thanks for any ideas or suggestions.
 
  Cliff 
 
  Hi Y'all,
 
  I have been using LO 4.0.5 for some time and just installed 4.1.3.2. 
  Opened a
  document that I had been doing in 4.0.5 and found that 4.1.3.2 doesn't see
  one of my fonts, Calibri Light. It doesn't appear in the list of fonts at
  all. Only the base Calibri appears. In 4.0.5 both the base and the Light
  appear as separate fonts in the font dropdown list. I'm running OSx 10.7.5 
  on
  a MacBook Pro. Checked via the Font Book app and Calibri Light appears
  normally. Validated the font and no problems were found. Interestingly
  Calibri Light was the last font I have installed. Even reinstalled it. I
  would normally reboot to make sure something wasn't just funny that would 
  be
  corrected by rebooting, but can't do that right now. Ideas anyone? 
 
  Thanks.
  Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Wordstar

2013-11-04 Thread James Knott
Marc Grober wrote:
 And I wish I was still able to use wordstar ;-)

I used to use Wordstar 2000 at work.



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1.3.2

2013-11-04 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Marc Grober m...@interak.com on Mon, 04 Nov 2013
12:06:32 -0900

Hi Marc,

Thanks for the reply.

 I guess I should first ask if you open a doc that has text formatted as
 Calibri Light,  what font is it being shown as under 4.1.2.3, what is
 the provenance of the Calibri Light,   have you confirmed that the font
 is available for all uses and all users, and whether it is not only
 activated but enabled (two different things).

Have tried a document formatted with Calibri Light and just a blank new doc.
Calibri Light does not show up in the dropdown font list at the top of the
page in LO 4.1.3.2. In the document itself the text formatted with Calibri
Light shows Calibri Light in italics at the top of the LO window indicating
that LO doesn't find the font and is substituting another font. Same doc in
LO 4.0.5 shows Calibri Light in the dropdown list as well as correctly using
the font in the document.

I am the only user on the machine. I have checked that it is available,
enabled and verified using the OSx Font Book app. that comes with OSx. I went
so far as to remove the whole Calibri Font family from the system, rebooted
and verified it was gone then reinstalled the Calibri Family again. The
symptoms after that were  identical to before.

Seems to me that if one version sees the font that it is available to the
system and the issue has to be with LO 4.1.3.2.

 
 Then I might suggest logging out of your account on the subject machine,
 logging in with a new account, creating a new document, checking the
 default font, and then typing some text and try to format it as calibri
 Light. This should resolve all questions as to whether the issue has
 something to do with your pre-existing preferences, non-availability as
 a system, font, etc.
 
 If no joy, download Scrivener, install and test and see if Calibri Light
 shows up and is usable. If not,  then there is an issue with your font, 
 if it does then you may be looking at a bug

Opened OpenOffice and it sees the font just fine. Actually it sees better
that LO 4.0.5 in that it shows Calibri Light and Calibri Light Italic in the
font list. LO 4.0.5 only shows Calibri Light.

Time for a bug report it seems to me.

Cliff

 
 
 On 11/4/13, 11:38 AM, Cliff Scott wrote:
  ** Reply to message from Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com on Sat, 2 Nov
  2013 15:29:02 -0500
 
  Reminder: This is on a Mac with OSx Lion (10.7.5).
 
  Sorry for replying to my own message, but I finally rebooted and no help. I
  removed the whole family of fonts and reinstalled them and still LO 4.1..3.2
  will not recognize Calibri Light. This is mind boggling to me since, as far
  as I can see, it sees all the other installed fonts. This may sound strange,
  but without this font I cannot use this version. This is a key font in a
  newsletter I publish.
 
  Please, if anyone has any ideas what can be done to make this work speak up.
  I would very much like to upgrade to the 4.1.3.2 version, but can't with 
  this
  issue.
 
  Thanks for any ideas or suggestions.
 
  Cliff 
 
  Hi Y'all,
 
  I have been using LO 4.0.5 for some time and just installed 4.1.3.2. 
  Opened a
  document that I had been doing in 4.0.5 and found that 4.1.3.2 doesn't see
  one of my fonts, Calibri Light. It doesn't appear in the list of fonts at
  all. Only the base Calibri appears. In 4.0.5 both the base and the Light
  appear as separate fonts in the font dropdown list. I'm running OSx 10.7.5 
  on
  a MacBook Pro. Checked via the Font Book app and Calibri Light appears
  normally. Validated the font and no problems were found. Interestingly
  Calibri Light was the last font I have installed. Even reinstalled it. I
  would normally reboot to make sure something wasn't just funny that would 
  be
  corrected by rebooting, but can't do that right now. Ideas anyone? 
 
  Thanks.
  Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-04 Thread Urmas

Virgil Arrington:

Actually, WordStar had different Ctrl+key functions than Word. Yes, today, 
Ctrl+J is a shortcut for Justify, but back in the WordStar days, Ctrl+J did 
something different...


If it worked in Microsoft Word, how the hell it was 'captured' and 
'unavailable' for Wordstar, whatever function it had?




--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] meager color options

2013-11-04 Thread Brian Barker

At 19:29 04/11/2013 -0500, Tim Lungstrom wrote:

Well, if I knew were the color listing is stored, ...


Try user-profile/libreoffice/4/user/config/standard.soc (not that I'm 
suggesting that anyone should tinker this way).


Brian Barker


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] meager color options

2013-11-04 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
I'm glad to hear we have a wider range of colours than i thought.

I'd really like to see a colour-wheel and hex input but the thing i miss
most is a pipette to grab colour from anywhere on the screen.  Gimp has one
and i miss it in Draw.  I've always assumed it was just waiting for someone
to post a bug-report about.
Regards from
Tom :)


On 4 November 2013 21:30, Kracked_P_P---webmaster 
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:


 There is an option to include user defined colors.  I know this, since
 I had to do it for the text color of the official brochure we were
 working on many months ago.

 Tools / Options / LibreOffice / Colors

 There are options for Add, Modify, Edit, and Delete colors in the color
 table.

 So you can always add a new color to the list, and name it whatever you
 wish it to be.

 Yes, there are a low number of predefined colors, but I bet if someone
 would give a list of names and Hex codes for all of these non-listed
 colors then maybe they could be added to our font color selection.

 I assume you want colors like this:

 ORANGE 1 #FFA500
 ORANGE 2 #EE9A00
 ORANGE 3 CD8500
 ORANGE 4 #8B5A00
 ORANGE RED 1 #FF4500
 ORANGE RED 2 #EE4000
 ORANGE RED 3 #CD3700
 ORANGE RED 4 #8B2500
 ORCHID #DA70D6
 ORCHID 1 #FF83FA
 ORCHID 2 #EE7AE9
 ORCHID 3 #CD69C9
 ORCHID 4 #8B4789
 
 PAPAYA WHIP #FFEFD5
 PEACHPUFF 1 #FFDAB9
 PEACHPUFF 2 #EECBAD
 PEACHPUFF 3 #CDAF95
 PEACHPUFF 4 #8B7765
 PINK #FFC0CB
 PINK 1 #FFB5C5
 PINK 2 #EEA9B8
 PINK 3 #CD919E
 PINK 4 #8B636C
 PLUM #DDA0DD
 PLUM 1 #FFBBFF
 PLUM 2 #EEAEEE
 PLUM 3 #CD96CD
 PLUM 4 #8B668B
 POWDER BLUE #B0E0E6

 This is a 5 page list of names and colors - with 100 different Gray levels.

 http://libreoffice-na.us/colors-and-hex.pdf



 On 11/04/2013 03:47 PM, baldwin linguas wrote:
  You know, this has been bothering me for a while, but I've never brought
 it up:
  Why are our color options (for font color, highlight, table
  background, etc.) so limited?
 
  I confess, I know diddley about C++, but how hard would it be to get a
  color wheel,
  or some other means of choosing colors, say like available in Tk
  (tkinter, tcl/tk, etc.
  like shown here: http://zetcode.com/gui/tkinter/dialogs/ You can even
  enter a hexcode.)
  that would give us broader options?
 
  Should I make a feature request?
  Has nobody else never thought of this?
  Or am I missing something, and we have broader options than I think
  (we have 112 colors to choose from for fonts, 6 of which are white).
  Maybe a plugin using tcl/tk or python/tkinter wouldn't be too hard to
 make?
  (I've played with tcl/tk and python/tkinter, but never trying to make
 something
  to work with a larger project as a plugin, so not sure how that works).
 
  I love my LO (and OOo before it), but this has long occured to me as a
  glaring oversight, or something.
  Frankly, having not used any proprietary office suite for more than 5
  minutes in the past decade,
  I don't know what options they have for such features, but it seems to
 me that
  it would be better to have more flexibility in this regard, and it
  shouldn't be overly complex
  to implement (unless I'm sorely mistaken).
 
  Tony


 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] 64 bit

2013-11-04 Thread josip prusina
Hi. From where download 64 bit version libreoffice for windows 8.1. 64 bit.
? Link or manual tutorial for download 64 bit version..

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] trouble downloading

2013-11-04 Thread Andréa Hector-Brown
i am very excited to try your word processor, but it will not download.  i
am on mac osx 10.8.5 intel and every time i try to download it says it
can't find a way to mount.

which is kinda crazy.

then i'm just returned to the donations page.  i'd love to donate if i
could use the product.  is there someone who can help?

thank you
andréa

-- 
BlueLight http://www.myspace.com/bluelightonline and
HECTORhttp://hectorrox.bandcamp.comare my alter egos

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4.1.3.2

2013-11-04 Thread NoOp
On 11/04/2013 12:38 PM, Cliff Scott wrote:
 ** Reply to message from Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com on Sat, 2 Nov
 2013 15:29:02 -0500
 
 Reminder: This is on a Mac with OSx Lion (10.7.5).
 
 Sorry for replying to my own message, but I finally rebooted and no help. I
 removed the whole family of fonts and reinstalled them and still LO 4.1..3.2
 will not recognize Calibri Light. This is mind boggling to me since, as far
 as I can see, it sees all the other installed fonts. This may sound strange,
 but without this font I cannot use this version. This is a key font in a
 newsletter I publish.
 
 Please, if anyone has any ideas what can be done to make this work speak up.
 I would very much like to upgrade to the 4.1.3.2 version, but can't with this
 issue.
...

Sorry, can't help you with a Mac, but...

I copied the Calibri fonts from my Win7 partition and placed in my
~/.fonts folder on linux. Updated the font cache (sudo fc-cache -f -v),
opened LO 4.1.3.2 (Version: 4.1.2.3 Build ID:
40b2d7fde7e8d2d7bc5a449dc65df4d08a7dd38), and both Calibri and Calibri
Light show up in the font menu  work just fine. Note: When you use a
Calibri (or any other font set) you can see the options available via
'Format|Character'. I'm showing the following:

Calibri - Regular|Bold|Italic|Bold italic
Calibri Light - Light|Light Italic|Bold|Bold Italic

I'll now purge the font(s) due to licencing issues. :-)
I find that FreeSans 11 is a very close match to Calibri 12. You might
want to give that a try. http://www.gnu.org/software/freefont/






-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Re: trouble downloading

2013-11-04 Thread Alex Thurgood

Le 04/11/2013 20:24, Andréa Hector-Brown a écrit :

Hello Andréa,


i am very excited to try your word processor, but it will not download.  i
am on mac osx 10.8.5 intel and every time i try to download it says it
can't find a way to mount.


Which browser are you using to try and download LibreOffice ?

Which web page are you using to try and download LibreOffice ?

Which language pack/version are you attempting to download ?


Alex



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted