Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LinuxQuestions.org's Office Suite of the Year: LibreOffice!

2015-02-08 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 6 February 2015 at 12:25, Paul paulste...@afrihost.co.za wrote: Out of interest Italo, why would you say the Wine option is not comparable to a native binary? Yes, interesting, given that LO contains non-native components - those that require Java VM. LO Base with HSQL even requites it. So

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LinuxQuestions.org's Office Suite of the Year: LibreOffice!

2015-02-08 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 7 February 2015 at 13:22, Jean-Baptiste Faure jbfa...@libreoffice.org wrote: Le 06/02/2015 22:02, Urmas a écrit : Italo Vignoli: You need to understand that there are only two kinds of soft- and hardware: that which solves the client problem at adequate cost, and that which doesn't.

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LinuxQuestions.org's Office Suite of the Year: LibreOffice!

2015-02-08 Thread Jay Lozier
On 02/08/2015 01:09 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: On 7 February 2015 at 13:22, Jean-Baptiste Faure jbfa...@libreoffice.org wrote: Le 06/02/2015 22:02, Urmas a écrit : Italo Vignoli: You need to understand that there are only two kinds of soft- and hardware: that which solves the client problem

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LinuxQuestions.org's Office Suite of the Year: LibreOffice!

2015-02-08 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) I think my favourite answer so far has been Alex's. I liked all those stats kinda suggesting that one reason for excluding MS Office from the poll is just that it's sooo unpopular in Linux. Regards from Tom :) On 8 February 2015 at 18:09, Jaroslaw Staniek stan...@kde.org wrote: On 7