Hi!
I wanted to know why LibreOffice doesn't uses GitHub to maintain their
source code. I personally wanted to start contributing but after I saw
it wasn't on GitHub i started to think twice. I believe this is a
serious drawback.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.
At 20:23 11/02/2016 -0500, Joshua Kramer wrote:
I'm wondering if someone can please take a look at the attached sheet.
No! Attached files are generally removed by the mailing list
processor before messages are distributed. So no-one will have seen
your document or be able to see what you mean
On 2/10/16 9:32 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 10/02/16 10:53 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 2/10/16 4:27 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 10/02/16 12:01 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 2/10/16 8:28 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 09/02/16 11:39 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 2/9/16 2:23 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 09/02/16 03:23
Hello,
I'm wondering if someone can please take a look at the attached sheet.
Specifically, columns B and C. Note that the named range
"ExpensesPlanned" is B9-B42; "ExpensesActual" is C9-C42. On line 45,
there are totals for the named ranges. However, for some reason, any
numbers entered into l
Perhaps the BASIC code was only displaying the number to a few decimal
places. In C, printf defaults to 6 decimal places, which isn't enough to
show the actual result as any different from the ideal result.
It's also possible that the spreadsheet was doing something more
complicated internally
On 12/02/16 1:21 AM, James Knott wrote:
On 02/11/2016 03:33 AM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
And there is the distinction between precision and accuracy. You can
be very precisely inaccurate.
I guess you've never studied Calculus, where the answer often
approaches, but never actually reaches some val
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 07:21:31AM -0500, James Knott wrote:
> On 02/11/2016 03:33 AM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
> > And there is the distinction between precision and accuracy. You can
> > be very precisely inaccurate.
>
> I guess you've never studied Calculus, where the answer often
> approaches, but
On 2016-02-11, 9:14 AM Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 10/02/2016 20:10, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
Hi Larry,
LibreOffice 5.1.0 doesn't find the installed Java on my Mac (MacBook Pro
Retina, OS X version 10.11.3). Had to reinstall LibreOffice 5.0.4.
Which JRE are you using ?
1.8.0_73
The workar
Le 10/02/2016 23:46, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
>
> As I said in my original post, i reinstalled LibreOffice 5.0.4. Java is
> recognized in the Preference settings. There is a bug in LO 5.1 which
> prevents LibreOffice finding Java.
>
>
From what I recall, it was a deliberate code change in th
Le 10/02/2016 20:10, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
Hi Larry,
> LibreOffice 5.1.0 doesn't find the installed Java on my Mac (MacBook Pro
> Retina, OS X version 10.11.3). Had to reinstall LibreOffice 5.0.4.
>
Which JRE are you using ?
The workaround is to install a corresponding full latest JDK inste
On 11/02/16 09:37 AM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
Thanks for the tip, but back in 1989 when this was all happening, I'm
not sure that my DOS spreadsheet even had the ability to display
numbers as "currency". I certainly made no attempt to do so, even if
it were possible. They were just numbers and,
Thanks for the tip, but back in 1989 when this was all happening, I'm
not sure that my DOS spreadsheet even had the ability to display numbers
as "currency". I certainly made no attempt to do so, even if it were
possible. They were just numbers and, yes, integers, and no, the
spreadsheet didn't
On 02/11/2016 03:33 AM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
> And there is the distinction between precision and accuracy. You can
> be very precisely inaccurate.
I guess you've never studied Calculus, where the answer often
approaches, but never actually reaches some value. You can get closer
and closer, but n
At 15:18 10/02/2016 -0500, Virgil Arrington wrote:
About 25 years ago, I was the treasurer of my children's preschool.
I created a spreadsheet to calculate paychecks, and I found that the
paycheck was consistently off by .01 (a penny). It drove me nuts. As
it turned out, one part of the calcula
And there is the distinction between precision and accuracy. You can be
very precisely inaccurate.
Steve
On 2016-02-11 12:14, Virgil Arrington wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. Oddly enough, it makes some sense, even to
my non-techy brain. What I found interesting was that, in the
spreadsheet
15 matches
Mail list logo
