krackedpress wrote
I did not go through all of the 2525 color lines, and many of those
lines were given to me, as is, like the Crayola colors.
Some duplicates may be in color sequences, so they need to stay. Some
are not and can be removed. Some non-working colors will be fixed or
Milos Sramek wrote
For me, there are too many colors to choose from. I am lost in the (for
me too large) table of colors. For example, I do not know how to choose
a color, which is the same as some text elsewhere. It is even not
possible to compare the colors visually (color perception
CVAlkan wrote
Here's an experiment you can do:
Open a new document using whatever standard size is in effect.
At the top of the document, type dt and press F3. This generates the dummy
text.
In a separate text editor create a concordance file with the following
entries:
CVAlkan wrote
I've tried using AskLO several times and have never figured out how to set
up an account, ...
... all I see are ways to sign in using Google or Facebook and so forth,
and I don't have any of those accounts
This thread has become hijacked by several comments about requiring a
CVAlkan wrote
How does this get reported to the developers?
The best way is to raise a bug: https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/
Set the component to Extension and include as much detail about the issue as
you can. A second party (experiencing the same issue) can then confirm the
report.
edo1 wrote
The LO replacement table Tools Options LibreOffice Fonts doesn't
help, as it can't replace fonts one doesn't have.
This is /exactly/ the purpose of this replacement table i.e., it lets you
take control of which font you would like to see substituted for Garamond
(the missing
Joe Alders wrote
After a very disappointing experience using the LibreOffice Forum at the
'ask' part of the LibreOffice site, I will try this forum for help.
This is the related AskLO thread:
krackedpress wrote
So why do I reproduce the issue on Ubuntu 12.04LTS OS with the 64-bit
4.1.4.2 version [build - Build ID:
0a0440ccc0227ad9829de5f46be37cfb6edcf72], but your Debian 7.3.0 OS does
not reproduce it?
That is weird. Could there be some OS variant involved here? Same DEB
Cliff Scott-2 wrote
I've run into a strange occurrence in LO 4.1.4. Everytime I export to PDF
I
get a error message that PDF/A-1a forbids a transparency. Clicking OK
allows the export to continue and I don't see any problems in the
resultant
PDF, but this is something I've only seen on
Jay Lozier wrote
MSO 2010 and earlier did not support ODF 1.2 only ODF 1.1. I saw
somewhere that ODF 1.2 is supported in MSO 2013/Office 365.
The official statement was made on the MS Office blog in August 2012:
http://blogs.office.com/2012/08/13/new-file-format-options-in-the-new-office/
Malcolm Moore wrote
LO connects to CUPS on start not when you want to print. So if you have LO
open for a while the connection to CUPS will time out. You need to set
your CUPS timeout short enough so that it will time out eventually but
long enough so that CUPS doesn't drop the connection in
r_ouellette wrote
... now LO4.2 seems to ALWAYS embed all fonts, even if I don't want this
behavior. I would prefer to have an option not to embed all fonts to
revert to the pre 4.2 behavior. Maybe this option is possible in the
advanced settings, but I didn't find it.
The 14 standard
TomD wrote
Presumably it can be done straight from a command-line without even
needing a script as such.
This is an ideal task for a script. Invoking LO to determine ODF version
info is inefficient, especially for multiple files. Here is a basic bash
script to do the task under GNU/Linux:
Jim Seymour wrote
Pedro wrote:
So it's not a case that LO is not implementing the existing ODF
standards but that it is already improving on them (in an open
manner, unlike MS XML). So OASIS has to catch up :)
OASIS establishes the standards, no? If such is the case: What
you've written,
A wrote
Can anyone tell me how I can get the following date pattern in my (writer)
document?
15th day of March, 2014
As this https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7t=65620
Apache OO forum thread indicates, ordinal suffixes are not supported in date
fields. A format code of:
italovignoli wrote
Somewhere in the wiki there is a list of the extended features ...
For those interested, these can be found in the ODF Implementor Notes
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/ODF_Implementer_Notes#LibreOffice_ODF_extensions
.
Best wishes, Owen.
--
View this
Mucip wrote
I import this DRAW file as linked OLE object. But I can not center the
picture in OLE container/frame? When I adjust it once than it may change
later?! I can not fix the main picture region of the DRAW object in OLE
container/frame?
You will need to rescale the ODG prior to
Tanstaafl wrote
On 3/20/2014 5:28 PM, e-letter lt;
inpost@
gt; wrote:
Thank you. It is a worry that 17 out of 24 features are in fact
devoted to interoperability with m$.
Nope, not a worry at all. Compatibility with the office product that holds
the vast majority of the market share is
Mucip wrote
I came to decision that It's not good way to use OLE in my situation. :(
In my opinion OLE logic is not rock solid yet.
Unfortunately OLE is one area that has no equivalent in ODF (v1.2 of the
specification references the 1995 work Inside OLE by Kraig Brockschmidt).
In fact OLE is a
krackedpress wrote
On 03/24/2014 12:25 PM, Pedro wrote:
Owen Genat wrote
The 14 standard PostScript fonts are now (under v4.2+) always embedded,
as
required by PDF v1.5. I provide some detail here:
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/30069/pdf-font-embedding-in-libreoffice-42/?answer
Rogier F. van Vlissingen wrote
Thanks, but I guess there's no way to print them parallel to the text as I
can in MSWord?
This is an old enhancement request:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36815
There are some good mockups in the related Design Whiteboard page (refer
links).
Best
andrewH wrote
I am working with a data set that keeps causing my LibreOffice to freeze.
I am pretty sure that this is only because it is big. It is a
pipe-separated text from the US Economic Census imported into Calc, about
30 columns and around a million rows. (The actual data set is bigger,
TomD wrote
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/EPUB
I dunno why people insist on using all capitals or putting spaces into
urls but i've had trouble in the past with trying to get a consistent
naming convention sorted out and it's led to duplicates needing to be
merged.
Thanks for the link.
M. Fioretti wrote
Summarizing, it seems I need some efficient way to tell Calc, when it
opens that file, that all the cells of a certain column, except the
header, are NUMBERS, not text, in the -1234.12 format.
What Mirosław Zalewski has suggested upthread is essentially correct. The
data
office76#xt wrote
Hi,
I have a column of dates in Calc that look like this:
01.07.1986
...
Any way to reformat the Date column into some Date format that would allow
conditional formatting as just described? Any ideas welcome.
Given 01.07.1986 in cell A1 these entries in the
NoOp wrote
On 07/04/2014 12:37 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
There are a few reasons;
* Base needs an external back-end but most new users wont be aware of
that
Interesting. I never knew that Base needs an external back-end...
Perhaps you can get the documentation folks to add that to the
Alex Thurgood wrote
... file corruption when writing to an external disk drive. ... I have an
external FAT formatted LaCie hard drive to store my files on. ... I was
working from a USB external hard disk.
I would first try to reproduce the error without a USB external storage
device being a
JAMES-2 wrote
=YEARS(7/16/2012,TODAY(),1)
The literal date needs to be quoted: =YEARS(7/16/2012,TODAY(),1)
Best wishes, Owen.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/formula-years-since-date-tp4116088p4116090.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at
M. Fioretti wrote
When I wrote this, almost 10 years ago, things didn't looking too good
for inter-suite macro compatibility:
http://archive09.linux.com/feature/47935
today, I have the feeling thing's haven't really improved, when it
comes to macros inserted in ODF files, even considering
Charles-H. Schulz wrote
On this list (a few others as well but esp. On this one) people call
LibreOffice LO. We -sorry to take on my founder's hat here- never called
LibreOffice LO.
Acronyms / nicknames / shortcuts are rarely at the discretion of the one
being named. If the O in LibreOffice
Pedro wrote
The fact that the VBA is for Windows (and Mac?) is not related to locking
people in. VBA is a scripting language shared by all MSO programs to allow
automation.
I disagree. As my response upthread indicates, a macro language is designed
to allow access to an API i.e., an
Charles-H. Schulz wrote
On 26 juillet 2014 11:49:10 CEST, Pedro lt;
pedlino@
gt; wrote:
Maybe it needs more money/time invested?
Perhaps. I don't have the numbers but Novell at the time invested in this
for something like 4-5 year and put several people on it so it was never
exactly a
Scott Jones wrote
32-bit System the problem causes LO to crash constantly when starting
soffice.exe which is what runs when quickstart.exe is run. Can
intermittently get soffice.exe and swriter.exe etc to run.
64-bit System the problem is that I can run soffice.exe seemingly no
problem
Pedro wrote
The problem is that it is difficult to find a word that explains that one
version is new (with new features/bugs/regressions) and the other one has
been patched so that new features are already stable.
Is this some sort of l10n/i18n issue? I ask because this problem has been
solved
italovignoli wrote
OOXML Strict is supported only by MS Office 2013, while all other MS
Office incarnations will not open it (and will tell the user that the
file is corrupted).
This statement is not accurate. ISO/IEC 29500 Strict can be opened / edited
by MSO 2010 and opened / edited / saved
sophi wrote
I agree with you, several of the discussions happening here should
happen on the discuss@ list ...
Sophie, is there some reason why under the Nabble interface the global
discuss@ list is not included under the LibreOffice group, whereas most l10n
/ regional groups do include a
TomD wrote
The Doc, Xls, Ppt files all used to have this problem too but now that MS
have stopped developing it so much and moved to developing their newer
formats it's finally these older formats that ARE good for sharing between
different programs.
The old MS Binary specifications last had
Owen Genat wrote
The old MS Binary specifications last had an update of significance
(change in technical nature) on 2014-04-30 (XLS) and 2012-01-20 (DOC and
PPT).
Oops. I am already out of date. The DOC and XLSB specifications had a major
update 2014-07-31.
-
Best wishes, Owen.
--
View
TomD wrote
The OOXML standard has been through 3 revisions [...] Apparently first put
through in 2012. [...] ODF (Open Document Format) [...] has been an ISO
since 2006. Apparently it was complete enough first time and has never
needed to be revised.
This is inaccurate and not a good
italovignoli wrote
On 10/08/14 03:01, Owen Genat wrote:
The Transitional and Strict formats are both defined in ISO/IEC 29500.
In ISO/IEC 29500 there is only one transitional definition, while
Microsoft has produced three different transitional versions (two
without definition, i.e
Charles-H. Schulz wrote
Quick note in passing. I fail to see how thr discussion on xml standards
implementations is of any interest to our users. May I (respectfully)
suggest that interested parties bring this conversation to our discuss
list?
Duly noted. I posted my last response before
Ivan Ivanov wrote
Maybe the option Pair Kerning disables the default kerning, but most of
the fonts use the GPOS table for kern pairs and that can't be disabled...
There is at least one comment in the source code indicating that GPOS
kerning is handled by HarfBuzz. GPOS kerning should however
jmadero wrote
I have the 4.3 ppa installed and it's completely broken my package
manager. Pastebin link: http://pastebin.com/YLcZsUJT
I can't even purge, I get this error: http://pastebin.com/tsG5d7w2
Ubuntu appears to have broken a maintenance script. I think this is the same
issue as
Alexandros Prekates wrote
Downloading a gdoc document from google drive you will prompted to
choose a conversion.
Choosing 'open document' i get an odt but i spotted an error in
giving 'outline numbering = 10' to even headling styled with headline 1
and superfluous xml in links.
I
steveedmonds wrote
How do I add a footnote when it doesn't have a reference.
I have some footnotes with and some without references (anchors).
Please clarify, with an example, exactly what is meant by doesn't have a
reference and without references (anchors) as this is not clear.
Footnotes
jmadero wrote
Are styles supposed to retain properties like bold. I am consistently
getting mixed results using styles.
The comments up-thread by Kevin O'Brien and Brian Barker are correct,
despite a number of disagreements. So called direct or manual (directly
applied) formatting will always
Mark Bourne wrote
The .docx format changes slightly with each version of MS Office.
So do the Microsoft Binary (DOC et al.) formats. Major revisions for DOC
were on 2009-07-13, 2010-06-07, 2012-01-20, and 2014-07-31.
Mark Bourne wrote
For compatibility between MS Office and LibreOffice, the
Luuk wrote
They talk about 'Office 2007', not about the versions after that one
The article was written late 2010. MS Office 2010 is mentioned (four times).
Luuk wrote
The last 2 years of revisions (2nd link) are all No changes to the
meaning effectively making the specs old, and
MR ZenWiz wrote
I noticed that in LO Writer 4.3.1, the print icon no longer
automatically prints a document but brings up the print window.
Yes. Prior releases used the Print File Directly button and in v4.3 this
has been replaced with the Print... button. As Valter Mura indicated this
can be
ponsiarceds wrote
Package lodevbasis4.4-core05 is always missing.
This has been reported as https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82288
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Daily-Master-64bit-deb-Install-Failure-tp4124903p4124914.html
Sent from the
Owen Genat wrote
ponsiarceds wrote
Package lodevbasis4.4-core05 is always missing.
This has been reported as
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82288
Issue is now fixed. All previous coreNN packages have been bundled into a
single large core package.
--
View this message
The related enhancement is likely:
http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36310.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Navigator-References-Drag-Mode-Useless-Deprecated-tp4138321p4138426.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Pedro wrote
>
> Robert Funnell wrote
>> What about unzipping the .odt/.odp/whatever file and searching for
>> font names in the resulting .xml files? (Again, I haven't tried this.)
> That would make sense. Unfortunately the file styles.xml lists some 55
> fonts
> From a PDF copy of the
I would raise a bug as the clipboard content for text/richtext does indeed
appear to be RTF. It appears to have always been this way, based on cursory
tests using v3.3.4.1. Referring to bug tdf#40262:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40262
... it is worth noting that clipboard
54 matches
Mail list logo
