I think the sort dialogue should be remade from scratch anyway. Also
the default settings are strange, I think. For example the setting
that lets the cell format follow the cell value, when is that ever a
good idea?
Kind regards
Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-m
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
>
> Hi :)
> Is that 2 separate bug-reports or just one?
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport
> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
You caught me. :-) It was a bug report and a feature request rolled int
--- On Mon, 20/8/12, MR ZenWiz wrote:
From: MR ZenWiz
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Data sort with column labels broken in 3.6
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Monday, 20 August, 2012, 2:40
I just used Calc 3.6 for the first time, and the data sort with column
labels fails - it used to do the
Hi :)
Is that 2 separate bug-reports or just one?
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Mon, 20/8/12, MR ZenWiz wrote:
From: MR ZenWiz
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Data sort with column labels broken in 3.6
To
I just used Calc 3.6 for the first time, and the data sort with column
labels fails - it used to do the right thing and leave the labels row
at the top - now this shows up at the bottom of the sort selection.
When this is fixed, would it be possible for the labels selection
field be on the primary
