Hi Marc,
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:03 -0800, Marc Grober wrote:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35361
...
that you knew you are creating extra work for the volunteers on the QA
team with intend is really disgusting given the workload of this team.
I suspect that what upset
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:00 -0800, Marc Grober wrote:
The latest from Florian in misspelled CAPS (which now brings us to the
fact that the devs have touched this bug some 8 times without ever
bothering to actually read it) - Bravo Florian, we read you 5 by 5:
I've read it a couple of
leif wrote:
Half the problem is communication.
Very much to the point.
1) simply commenting a bug does _not_ remove NEEDINFO status - in
this case, only if the submitter had commented _and_ changed
status to NEW, the bugs wouldn't have been closed
2) exposing users to the
2012/8/17 Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org
Sorry for the mess - but I would hate us arguing over
spilled milk, instead of moving ahead.
-- Thorsten
+1
These are the most well spoken words in this case so far :-)
Cheers,
Leif
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Hi Michael and all,
May I suggest that we try to close down the discussion and try to find an
acceptable approach?
I believe that Michaels earlier mail explained the context and (as I read
it) also include a small *apologize*.
I suggest that
- we send a polite and excusing mail to all the
Hi :)+1 Regards fromTom :)
--- On Fri, 17/8/12, Leif Lodahl leiflod...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Leif Lodahl leiflod...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Excuse me, but your opinion is simply
unimportant. Start over and you can expect more of the same.
To:
Hi :)
Interesting thought and a good diagram, thanks :)
Something i have wondered for a while is how to utilise what this particular
list has to offer, perhaps confirming bug-reports could be partially done
through this list?
Occasionally someone new on this list expresses an interest in
And now someone has jumped on my bug and changed my reporting so that it shows
that it is only in 3.3 - that's the last straw. I will not have anything
further to do with bug reporting. All those fine devs can choke on their bloody
buggy product. Congratulations! You have alienated yet another
Gr, can't you just change it back?
Don't go! If you do you will be missed!
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Thu, 16/8/12, Marc Grober m...@interak.com wrote:
From: Marc Grober m...@interak.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Excuse me, but your opinion is simply
unimportant. Start
On 8/16/12 7:07 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Gr, can't you just change it back?
rant
That is not the point, Tom.
This bug was only really a matter of a file having been dropped. But the
devs have spent more time fiddling with how it is listed than if they
had just added the missing file. More
Hi Marc,
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 08:23 -0800, Marc Grober wrote:
But the devs have spent more time fiddling with how it is listed
One thing that frustrates me, since I've only just subscribed is that
we seem to be talking about a load of bugs with no numbers I can easily
lookup.
The latest from Florian in misspelled CAPS (which now brings us to the
fact that the devs have touched this bug some 8 times without ever
bothering to actually read it) - Bravo Florian, we read you 5 by 5:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35361
Florian Reisinger reisi...@gmail.com
And here is the best bit:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35361
--- Comment #42 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com
2012-08-16 16:58:22 UTC ---
@Marc:
Seeing you boasting here:
I put the bug back into Resolved-Invalid status.
Done. Excuse me while I go abuse myself :-)
On 8/16/12 9:03 AM, Marc Grober wrote:
And here is the best bit:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35361
--- Comment #42 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com
2012-08-16
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:13:01 +0200
Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de wrote:
Am 14.08.2012 20:48, Marc Grober wrote:
This (see the quote below) is simply unacceptable. In fact, with
respect to the bug on which I received this little gem quite a few
people had been at pains to clearly
Am 15.08.2012 08:03, Thomas Taylor wrote:
Hi Andreas,
I am not trying to be critical but for the last 2-3 releases no email
message was received about NEED INFO. That had been done in earlier
releases. Is there a malfunction in the bug reporting system? My
programming days are many years
Marc Grober wrote
First, I may be inconsequential, but I did not see any apology.
Perhaps it only went out on the dev list.
Yes the apology was issued over on the Dev and QA lists--inserted below.
But we folks on the QA and User side do have a responsibility to follow our
bugs when
Am 15.08.2012 20:05, leif wrote:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39523
The bug has never been commented by humans and all later activity was
automated (except the once from my hand).
The perfect example for what went wrong here. Someone tagged it blindly
as NEEDINFO although
Ditto on mine. this was just mindless
On 8/15/12 10:50 AM, Andreas Säger wrote:
Am 15.08.2012 20:05, leif wrote:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39523
The bug has never been commented by humans and all later activity was
automated (except the once from my hand).
I was curious as to what the commotion on this subject was so I looked
at the bug submitted wherein I found the automated message:
Björn Michaelsen 2011-12-23 12:27:51 UTC
[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
Yes and no.
The initial news about bug tracker issues went out in March.
Many responded, as did I, updating the bug to confirm that it was still
a bug In fact, at the time I specifically asked why we needed to
confirm the bug if in fact the bug was long stnding and nothing had been
done
Thanks for your comments. What still remains unclear to me (not that it
matters as I have no influence/authority on anything done by anyone -
I'm simply trying to help you all sort it out so somebody in a position
to do something can then do it) is whether the bug status was changed in
that
On 8/15/12 1:57 PM, Andrew Brager wrote:
Thanks for your comments. What still remains unclear to me (not that it
matters as I have no influence/authority on anything done by anyone -
I'm simply trying to help you all sort it out so somebody in a position
to do something can then do it) is
On 8/15/2012 3:20 PM, Marc Grober wrote:
On 8/15/12 1:57 PM, Andrew Brager wrote:
Thanks for your comments. What still remains unclear to me (not that it
matters as I have no influence/authority on anything done by anyone -
I'm simply trying to help you all sort it out so somebody in a
I've seen at least one or two people respond to the question. For some
reason you don't appear to be seeing all the posts here. In particular
you didn't respond to one of my own, specifically addressing your font
issue wherein I provided a possible resolution.
This particular message I'm
In fact it was explained twice before, so perhaps some of the list mail
is going in to your spam folder?
AOO is the apache branch of OpenOffice
On 8/15/12 4:34 PM, anne-ology wrote:
I too would like to know.
It's been mentioned a few times now ... someone asks what is it, yet
It was answered in this message:
http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/msg22778.html
And also (unnecessarily snarkily) in this one:
http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/msg22784.html
AOO = Apache Open Office
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, anne-ology wrote:
I too would
Ok, I've received your message of 2 paragraphs [still below] -
you state you will answer the question; where is the answer
??? ;-)
Maybe I'm not receiving all the messages ... maybe your message was
clipped for some reason ...
but if you sent more than is
Thank you.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Robert Funnell robert.funn...@mcgill.cawrote:
It was answered in this message:
http://listarchives.**libreoffice.org/global/users/**msg22778.htmlhttp://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/msg22778.html
And also (unnecessarily
Thank you.
Obviously, some of the list mail is not getting through -
BTW - as for me, these can't be landing in the 'spam folder' since I
always check to be sure there's nothing there by mistake, before deleting
these
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Marc Grober
You don't seem to understand what I wrote. Bottom line is, it's in the
archives - search for it there. I'm sure someone else can help you with
that - don't ask me because I don't know how.
On 8/15/2012 7:19 PM, anne-ology wrote:
Ok, I've received your message of 2 paragraphs [still
Am 14.08.2012 20:48, Marc Grober wrote:
This (see the quote below) is simply unacceptable. In fact, with respect
to the bug on which I received this little gem quite a few people had
been at pains to clearly identify the problem and the potential
solution, and neither having changed at all,
On 14/08/12 21:13, Andreas Säger wrote:
I'm going to upgrade all our production systems to AOO 3.4.1
What is AOO?
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines +
2012/8/14 Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de
+1
Today I got 16 such mails.
Hi,
Yes there has been a mistake - all mails has been send four times.
The guy made a mistake and he apologized for that and I'm pretty sure he
won't do that mistake next time. Mistakes happen no matter what
AOO is the apache open office.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive:
Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote
On 14/08/12 21:13, Andreas Säger wrote:
I'm going to upgrade all our production systems to AOO 3.4.1
What is AOO?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=AOO
--
View this message in context:
36 matches
Mail list logo
