Am 15.07.2013 19:18, schrieb Tom Davies:
> Errr, that graph is rather confusing me. It's good when it dips lower,
> right? Although could that be bad in some way? Does it mean less bugs
> being reported?
That's correct, so ideally the chart should simultaneously show the # of
bugs reported.
July 2013, 17:12
>Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: QA Triage Contest
>
>
>Am 15.07.2013 13:40, schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen:
>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 06:36:29PM +0200, Nino Novak wrote:
>>> can we see the effect graphically?
>>
>> https://bugs.freedesktop
ce.org
>Cc: libreoffice...@lists.freedesktop.org
>Sent: Monday, 15 July 2013, 17:12
>Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: QA Triage Contest
>
>
>Am 15.07.2013 13:40, schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen:
>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 06:36:29PM +0200, Nino Novak wrote:
>>> can we see the effect gra
Am 15.07.2013 13:40, schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 06:36:29PM +0200, Nino Novak wrote:
>> can we see the effect graphically?
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/reports.cgi?product=LibreOffice&datasets=UNCONFIRMED
Yep, nice - thanks :)
Though, a significant decline seems to h
Am 11.07.2013 16:36, schrieb Joel Madero:
> Hi All,
>
> So as you all know the contest is over and it was a great success. Just
> under 25% of the bug count dropped but substantially more bugs were
> triaged as we kept up with the daily demand on top of tackling older bug
> reports.
Joel,
can we
