Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: documentation for LO base

2012-10-15 Thread Wolfgang Keller
 I use it at the office for time registration and invoicing. At home
 for the Taekwon-do club membership.

Should I perceive that as a threat? ;-

 It's actually marvelous in combination with postgresql SDBC driver.
 And actually useful as it is so easy to get your data to Calc, more
 useful then I remember Access.

In fact that's also the only application case that I would consider
using Calc and Writer for in their current state - for graphing and
printing database data.

Imho the most logical and least error-prone way to use Calc is to do
all your calculations in PostgreSQL and only display and graph the
results in Calc. *Never* do complex calculations in Calc.

 It always hurts a bit when people who don't use databases say that
 Base is not good, databases are not useful etc.

Because they don't have a use for it (pure letter-writers for home-use)
or because they don't have a clue (most office users).
 
 I know a lot of people that never use a spreadsheet either. But I
 think LO wouldn't be complete with Calc or Base.

You mean withOUT, I presume?
 
Sincerely,

Wolfgang

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: documentation for LO base

2012-10-09 Thread Ferry Toth
I agree.

I use it at the office for time registration and invoicing. At home for
the Taekwon-do club membership.

It's actually marvelous in combination with postgresql SDBC driver. And
actually useful as it is so easy to get your data to Calc, more useful
then I remember Access.

It always hurts a bit when people who don't use databases say that Base
is not good, databases are not useful etc.

I know a lot of people that never use a spreadsheet either. But I think
LO wouldn't be complete with Calc or Base.

My experience: de builtin hsql backend was very slow last time I tried,
sqlite unusefull, mysql OK but I couldn't find anything like PG Admin to
administer it. 

So, if you have the choice, go for postgresql.

Ferry

Wolfgang Keller schreef op za 06-10-2012 om 21:34 [+0200]:

  I am going to stick my head above the parapet and say it should have
  an embedded database functionality that is secure and reliable.
 
 Since recently, LO comes with a native driver for PostgreSQL. That's
 probably the best thing that the LO developers have done for quite
 some time. Since it makes LO Base actually useable *and a lot better*
 than Access (which is unusable with PostgreSQL).
 
  That is an essential requirement for entry-level users that have only
  ever used Access.
 
 Reliability? As an essential requirement for Access users?
 
 Huh?
 
 Access is a pathological data shredder.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Wolfgang
 

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: documentation for LO base

2012-10-09 Thread Jay Lozier
On 10/09/2012 05:01 PM, Ferry Toth wrote:
 I agree.

 I use it at the office for time registration and invoicing. At home for
 the Taekwon-do club membership.

 It's actually marvelous in combination with postgresql SDBC driver. And
 actually useful as it is so easy to get your data to Calc, more useful
 then I remember Access.

 It always hurts a bit when people who don't use databases say that Base
 is not good, databases are not useful etc.

 I know a lot of people that never use a spreadsheet either. But I think
 LO wouldn't be complete with Calc or Base.

 My experience: de builtin hsql backend was very slow last time I tried,
 sqlite unusefull, mysql OK but I couldn't find anything like PG Admin to
 administer it. 
mysql workbench (available from Oracle) works well with MySQL/MariaDB

 So, if you have the choice, go for postgresql.

 Ferry

 Wolfgang Keller schreef op za 06-10-2012 om 21:34 [+0200]:

 I am going to stick my head above the parapet and say it should have
 an embedded database functionality that is secure and reliable.
 Since recently, LO comes with a native driver for PostgreSQL. That's
 probably the best thing that the LO developers have done for quite
 some time. Since it makes LO Base actually useable *and a lot better*
 than Access (which is unusable with PostgreSQL).

 That is an essential requirement for entry-level users that have only
 ever used Access.
 Reliability? As an essential requirement for Access users?

 Huh?

 Access is a pathological data shredder.

 Sincerely,

 Wolfgang



-- 
Jay Lozier
jsloz...@gmail.com


-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: documentation for LO base

2012-10-09 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Back in my Mainframe days, I had to write a General Ledger Accounting 
system in COBOL [not my choice] with a master database file[s] used 
for more than just accounting.  If anyone wants to choose to say 
packages like Base is not good or some other negative term, ask them to 
try and write the database package from scratch with programming 
languages that are not designed to be a flexible as the modern 
object-oriented languages.


I have not used Access since 2000 or 2003, so I have not used Base, 
except to try it once and awhile.


To be honest, one reason why we do not have much Base documentation is 
the simple fact that there are not as many people out there that know 
Base well enough and can write documentation. It is much easier to find 
Writer and Calc documentation, since more people use it and understand 
it better than Base.  That does not mean that Base is not a good 
package, just one that it not used as in-dept by as many people as the 
other parts of LO.




On 10/09/2012 05:01 PM, Ferry Toth wrote:

I agree.

I use it at the office for time registration and invoicing. At home for
the Taekwon-do club membership.

It's actually marvelous in combination with postgresql SDBC driver. And
actually useful as it is so easy to get your data to Calc, more useful
then I remember Access.

It always hurts a bit when people who don't use databases say that Base
is not good, databases are not useful etc.

I know a lot of people that never use a spreadsheet either. But I think
LO wouldn't be complete with Calc or Base.

My experience: de builtin hsql backend was very slow last time I tried,
sqlite unusefull, mysql OK but I couldn't find anything like PG Admin to
administer it.

So, if you have the choice, go for postgresql.

Ferry

Wolfgang Keller schreef op za 06-10-2012 om 21:34 [+0200]:


I am going to stick my head above the parapet and say it should have
an embedded database functionality that is secure and reliable.

Since recently, LO comes with a native driver for PostgreSQL. That's
probably the best thing that the LO developers have done for quite
some time. Since it makes LO Base actually useable *and a lot better*
than Access (which is unusable with PostgreSQL).


That is an essential requirement for entry-level users that have only
ever used Access.

Reliability? As an essential requirement for Access users?

Huh?

Access is a pathological data shredder.

Sincerely,

Wolfgang




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: documentation for LO base

2012-10-08 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
I keep forgetting about this one even though i have added it to the 
Publications page
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications
Regards from
Tom :)





 From: Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de
To: users@global.libreoffice.org 
Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 13:09
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: documentation for LO base
 
The ultimate guide by Mariano Casanova:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48635562/Base-Tutorial-OOo



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/documentation-for-LO-base-tp4010907p4010986.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted




-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: documentation for LO base

2012-10-07 Thread Wolfgang Keller
 Just like MSAccess, Base is extremely useful as a frontend for
 database engines.

The last time I tried to run a non-trivial query (involving a join) from
Access against PostgreSQL, the result was a never-ending cursor
animation. It seems that Access fetches *all* records from the database
and runs the query locally.

 You must not use the built-in JET engine with Access. HSQL is an
 excellent platform independent database engine but you must not embed
 HSQL in extensions which are installed and repackaged every time you
 open or close the so called database document.

Embedding databases anywhere is imho nonsense. Database *content* can
imho be passed around between users in a pretty fool-proof way as a
zipped SQL dump, if required.

Sincerely,

Wolfgang

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: documentation for LO base

2012-10-06 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 06.10.2012 21:34, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
 
 Huh?
 
 Access is a pathological data shredder.
 

Not as bad as Base's default type of database. This part of Base is not
even a valid proof-of-concept. The whole concept is dysfunctional by
design and nobody dares to stop this madness.
Just like MSAccess, Base is extremely useful as a frontend for database
engines. You must not use the built-in JET engine with Access. HSQL is
an excellent platform independent database engine but you must not embed
HSQL in extensions which are installed and repackaged every time you
open or close the so called database document.



-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: documentation for LO base

2012-10-04 Thread Andreas Säger
The ultimate guide by Mariano Casanova:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48635562/Base-Tutorial-OOo



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/documentation-for-LO-base-tp4010907p4010986.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: documentation for LO base

2012-10-04 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I think one of the guys who is writing the Base documentation for 
OpenOffice, and converting it to LO, is a very busy person and it is 
taking him a lot of time to do the work for OpenOffice and does not have 
as much time to convert each finished chapter to LO.  It also takes 
other people to look over the work and proofread and test out what is 
stated.  There seems not to be enough Base people who are able/willing 
to help with this hard process.


It seems that Draw and Base are the two more difficult modules to 
write guides for, with Base being the hardest.


Question:  How many people do you know use Base, or have tried to use 
Base?  Then ask the same for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw, and then 
Math.  I rarely use anything other than Writer or Calc, for LO's suite.


On 10/04/2012 09:01 AM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
Thanks :)  I just added it to the list in the Publications page
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications#Base
Regards from
Tom :)








From: Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 13:09
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: documentation for LO base

The ultimate guide by Mariano Casanova:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48635562/Base-Tutorial-OOo



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/documentation-for-LO-base-tp4010907p4010986.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted







--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted