Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$

2012-12-24 Thread e-letter
On 21/12/2012, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On 12/20/2012 10:25 PM, e-letter wrote: On 19/12/2012, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote: Readers, Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature of the word processor. (It's

[libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$

2012-12-21 Thread NoOp
On 12/20/2012 10:25 PM, e-letter wrote: On 19/12/2012, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote: Readers, Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple ... And the link to

[libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$

2012-12-20 Thread Alex Thurgood
Le 20/12/2012 00:19, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit : Hi Dennis, This requirement seems to emerge from users in public administration, somewhat akin to the use in law firms. I can certainly second the law firm requirement, and as a lawyer that also has to work with French public

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$

2012-12-20 Thread e-letter
On 19/12/2012, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote: Readers, Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple ... And the link to that bug report is... ? For LO (RSS

[libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$

2012-12-19 Thread NoOp
On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote: Readers, Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple ... And the link to that bug report is... ? -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: