On 2013-02-06 07:29, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
This consideration of migration and up-/down-level preservation would be an
useful lesson for actions taken on the ODF TC and in OpenOffice-legacy
implementations that provide breaking changes to default behavior. There
are more of those on their w
2013 06:57
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Re: LibreOffice 4.0
Many months ago, there was a notification that MSO2013 changed their XML
formatting from a "loose" to a "strict" version of the format. I do not
remember the exact wording b
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:57:05 -0500, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Re:
LibreOffice 4.0:
>EVERY time
>they release a new version, since 2007, they require the user to buy the
>new version to be compatible. They there is the big hike in buying
>their
Many months ago, there was a notification that MSO2013 changed their XML
formatting from a "loose" to a "strict" version of the format. I do not
remember the exact wording but they stated that MSO2010 may not read
MSO2013 files correctly. So that makes 3 releases of MSO on Windows
that are
Hi :)
Only MS Office 2007 and 2010 are available on Mac. They are re-named as 2008
and 2011 but basically are pretty much the same. However there are
compatibility issues with documents produced on one platform and then viewed on
the other. Documents produced with 2007 don't always look at al
On 05/02/13 14:07, Urmas wrote:
"Tom Davies":
On the other hand MS Office still does not support many features of
LibreOffice yet either.
Like custom toolbar backgrounds? I think people can live without those.
For example the Student's version of MSO doesn't include Publisher or
Access.
W
