Hi all,
I set RQS to limit all slots per user to 240 with:
...
limitusers {@phds} hosts @amds to slots=240
...
rkolson run his jobs and no problem.
then rqs of rkolson should be altered, so RQS set to:
...
limitusers rkolson hosts @amds to slots=500
limitusers {@phds} hos
with allocation rule fillup the scheduler tries to maximize the
amount of slots which can be collected on any host. The host
selection order depends usually *not* on the amount of free slots
(anyway this could be configured).
It looks like that you have either already some smaller jobs running
on
How about using the exclusive complex scheduling feature?
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24901_01/doc.62/e21978/management.htm#sthref431
And Reuti's reply to a similar
problem: http://gridengine.org/pipermail/users/2012-May/003535.html
-Ron
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Farran
To
Greetings.
I am try to setup my MPI Parallel Environment so that whole nodes are used
before going to the next node when looking for cores.
Our nodes have 64 cores. What I like is that if I ask for 128 cores (slots),
one compute node is selected with 64 cores, and then the next one with 64 c
Hey PK - I know you! :-)
Thanks everyone for your helpful information.I am now getting correct and
useful information for why a job will not start.
Best,
Joseph
On 06/08/2012 12:19 PM, Prakashan Korambath wrote:
I have often found "qalter -w p " output helpful in diagnosing the problems
I have often found "qalter -w p " output helpful in
diagnosing the problems. Try man "qalter" and search for
"poke" to get details.
Prakashan
On 06/08/2012 12:10 PM, Rayson Ho wrote:
This time it is performance reasons... in fact I was at a site that
was experiencing performance issues& t
Hi, Just wanted to followup with how we actually implemented our solution.
Gave the default queue a high nice (low priority)
Doubled our exec level slots config (2 x cores).
Created high priority attribute, forced and default off.
Created a high priority queue, doubled np_load_avg in it,
gave it a
This time it is performance reasons... in fact I was at a site that
was experiencing performance issues & the qmaster was using more
memory than they ever like (their qmaster has many services running on
the machine). So they also turned scheduler info off (the default was
on at that time - and yes
Me again :-)
The Queue access list by Linux groups ( /etc/group ) is working perfectly!
I submitted a test job to the bio queue from an account that has bio group
ownership and the job runs.When I submitt a test job to the bio queue from
an account that does *not* belong to the bio linux g
Am 08.06.2012 um 20:19 schrieb Rayson Ho:
> Thanks William - I was also wondering how others do this in the field.
>
> As far as I know, only the primary group is considered - it was like
> that since many, many years ago. But I was not sure how you guys
> define ACLs that need to handle the non-
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Rayson Ho wrote:
> That's the primary group ID we are talking about. You can think of it
> as Grid Engine only checks the primary group ID, so you need to have
> the primary group ID configured properly or else it won't work.
Let me clarify... I mean, it won't work
Hi Joesph,
I mean, the synchronization of non-primary (ie. secondary) group
membership to Grid Engine ACL.
Like I mentioned in my email to you last night, only the primary group
is considered - so for users in the "staff" group, when they run id
from the command line, do they get "staff" as the p
It is just the security paranoia, yes.
/I don't know of any way to do it within SGE, but it should be easy
enough with a host-based firewall (e.g. iptables on Linux). /
This answers it perfectly, thanks. Firewall is the answer.
Best,
Miro
On 06/07/2012 12:47 PM, Rayson Ho wrote:
What ar
On 06/08/2012 11:19 AM, Rayson Ho wrote:
but if Joseph is OK with using a cron
job to sync. membership then I can leave it aside for now - I will
need to work on a few more urgent things but will have more time later
this month.
Rayson
Hi Rayson.
If you are asking of the compute nodes get
On 06/08/2012 10:25 AM, Reuti wrote:
You can make one ACL containing these three Unix groups:
$ qconf -au @staff foobar
$ qconf -au @bio foobar
$ qconf -au @chem foobar
$ qconf -mattr queue user_lists foobar test
-- Reuti
Perfect! Exactly what I was looking for. Will test it soon.
Thank
Thanks William - I was also wondering how others do this in the field.
As far as I know, only the primary group is considered - it was like
that since many, many years ago. But I was not sure how you guys
define ACLs that need to handle the non-primary group case.
IMO, using external tools to syn
On 8 June 2012 18:12, Joseph Farran wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> How does one set access to an OGE queue to have access from more than one
> Linux group?
>
> So if I have Linux groups staff, bio, and chem, how do I make my "test" queue
> only accessible by these 3 groups?
Create an access_list (with
Am 08.06.2012 um 19:12 schrieb Joseph Farran:
> Greetings.
>
> How does one set access to an OGE queue to have access from more than one
> Linux group?
>
> So if I have Linux groups staff, bio, and chem, how do I make my "test" queue
> only accessible by these 3 groups?
You can make one ACL c
Greetings.
How does one set access to an OGE queue to have access from more than one Linux
group?
So if I have Linux groups staff, bio, and chem, how do I make my "test" queue
only accessible by these 3 groups?
What kind of Q type do I setup?
___
u
It turns out it was exactly that, local fonts were not installed for my user
account, once I installed them it worked like a champ.
Thanks for all your help guys!
Justin
-Original Message-
From: Reuti [mailto:re...@staff.uni-marburg.de]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 5:51 AM
To: Wagner,
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Mark Dixon wrote:
> My underlying concern is that sometimes it is appropriate to set an address
> space limit and sometimes it isn't, for the reasons we both put forward
> previously in this thread. Users should therefore have some control over it.
>
> I hope we agr
Am 07.06.2012 um 01:20 schrieb Wagner, Justin:
> We have using this scenario:
>
> -X11 server running on a machine from which we connect to another remote
> machine and execute 'qmon' there
And both user accounts are tested from this one and the same machine? Sometimes
local fonts are missing,
Am 01.06.2012 um 03:42 schrieb Joseph Farran:
> Adding these lines at the end of /default/common/sge_request
>
> -cwd
> -S /bin/bash
NB: It's also possible to change in the queue setting "shell_start_mode
unix_behavior" which then honor the first line of the script and you don't need
-S any mo
hi
This kind of question should be direct to Oracle, IMHO.
In theory you can setup different arco_user and schema (e.g. PostgreSQL)
similar to multi-cluster setup (please see the dos)
regards
On 6/8/2012 4:45 AM, Arturo wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if it is possible to have to views in AR
Hi,
I would like to know if it is possible to have to views in ARCO, one for
admins and another for users.
Now I have the same queries for users and admins and I don't want that.
So is there any way to restrict access to ARCO users?
Thanks
Arturo
__
25 matches
Mail list logo
