Re: [gridengine users] Fair share policy

2019-02-27 Thread Reuti
Hi, > Am 27.02.2019 um 22:07 schrieb Kandalaft, Iyad (AAFC/AAC) > : > > HI Reuti > > I'm implementing only a share-tree. Then you can set: policy_hierarchy S The past usage is stored in the user object, hence auto_user_delete_time should be zero (and also in all the

Re: [gridengine users] Fair share policy

2019-02-27 Thread William Bryce
Hi Iyad, Reuti is correct the man sge_priority explains how sge calculates the priority of jobs. It includes the formula. I will say that if you intend to use share-tree with Array Jobs (i.e. qsub -t) then you will find out that the priority calculation is 'wrong' because it does not properly

Re: [gridengine users] Fair share policy

2019-02-27 Thread Kandalaft, Iyad (AAFC/AAC)
HI Reuti I'm implementing only a share-tree. The docs somewhere state something along the lines of use one or the other. I've seen the man page as It explains most of the math but leaves out some key elements. For example, how are "tickets" handed out and in what quantity (i.e. why do some

Re: [gridengine users] Fair share policy

2019-02-27 Thread Reuti
Hi, there is a man page "man sge_priority". Which policy do you intend to use: share-tree (honors past usage) or functional (current use), or both? -- Reuti > Am 25.02.2019 um 15:03 schrieb Kandalaft, Iyad (AAFC/AAC) > : > > Hi all, > > I recently implemented a fair share policy using