Re: Looking for testers & feedback: new Groovy binaries for Windows

I would suggest to keep the gant.exe, it makes really clear that you can execute that one on Windows. Otherwise I would not know that the application is there. (as in Linux where you can see the .sh files) On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Keegan Witt wrote: > Actually

Re: Looking for testers & feedback: new Groovy binaries for Windows

Actually question I guess would be whether we even need a gant.exe. Nobody really doubleclicks gant files that I'm aware of. -Keegan On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Keegan Witt wrote: > Hi Paco, > Thanks again for your help. Yea, it assumes Gant will be installed in

Re: Looking for testers & feedback: new Groovy binaries for Windows

Hi Paco, Thanks again for your help. Yea, it assumes Gant will be installed in the lib directory with the rest of the Groovy jars since that's how it's installed by the Windows installer. If you drop the jar in there, it should work. I'm mostly liking these so far. The only thing I might be

Re: Wrong bytecode generated for getters and setters of volatile field

Thanks Paul. Glad I could help figure this out. Good luck with the bug then. Cheers, Le mar. 11 oct. 2016 à 13:54, Paul King a écrit : > This is a bug in Groovy. Normally for a property those modifier bits > are cleared: > >

Wrong bytecode generated for getters and setters of volatile field

Hi, I am the developer of the SonarQube Java Analyzer. While we are doing an analysis we are reading bytecode of external dependencies of the compilation unit analyzed. A user recently came back on SonarQube google group complaining about a failure on one of the invariant we have in our bytecode