Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy 2.6 potential retirement to focus on Groovy 3.0

I would vote 2.Actually, i would vote 3) abandon 2.6 immediately.No projects I have any knowledge of still use jdk 7.

Re: What's the status of the Gpars library ?

Sounds like you have a volunteer Russel ;-)   Original Message   From: msz...@wp.pl Sent: 14 October 2017 20:15 To: users@groovy.apache.org Reply to: users@groovy.apache.org Subject: Re: What's the status of the Gpars library ? On 2017-10-14 13:31, David Dawson wrote: > Hi, > > I rece

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

>>> .com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931.html >>> Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> > > > -- > Guillaume Laforge > Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President > Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform > > Blog

Re: "Not handled exceptions" inspection?

places. But anyway.. no, the compiler does not check that. I guess >> you could write a transform or an extension to the type checker to add such >> a check. But there are no plans for anything like that atm >> >> bye Jochen >> > > > -- > Schalk W. Cronjé > Twitter / Ello / Toeter : @ysb33r > > -- David Dawson | CEO | Simplicity Itself Tel +44 7866 011 256 Skype: davidadawson david.daw...@simplicityitself.com http://www.simplicityitself.com

Re: building a jar from groovy script with gradle

From that perspective, I think the > shadowJar solution will result in fewer dependencies. Here's the link to > shadowJar if you want to check it out: > > https://github.com/johnrengelman/shadow > > Cheers, > > -H > > > On 3/8/16 6:40 AM, David Dawson wrote: > &g